Nissan 370Z Forum
Page 5 of 10 « First 34 5 67 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   For those that are interested in my broken car (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/74880-those-interested-my-broken-car.html)

ShutokuZ 08-12-2013 11:12 PM
Sound like everything is going to work out!
On the Jun cams, I had 272/272 cams in my Skyline and they produced more power than even the 272/272 Tomei's I had in there previous!

DEpointfive0 08-12-2013 11:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShutokuZ (Post 2443392)
Sound like everything is going to work out!
On the Jun cams, I had 272/272 cams in my Skyline and they produced more power than even the 272/272 Tomei's I had in there previous!
Whathuh? Skyline?


The problem I have with the cams is that Jun tested it with 100 octane or whatever, and I don't think anyone here has a real before and after. (Or I don't want to sort through 194 pages of BS)

ShutokuZ 08-12-2013 11:46 PM
True, I was running 105 octane most of the time.

theDreamer 08-13-2013 07:05 AM
No one has results of the JUN cams, the guy in Guam does not have a dyno so cannot see if there are results. Another set that went to the UAE I believe never got installed as he went for boost.
Also, the car JUN posted was using higher octane fuel AND higher compression (12:1 v 11:1 stock).

UNKNOWN_370 08-13-2013 08:14 AM
The cam and short tube header information for our cars is highly disappointing.

DEpointfive0 08-13-2013 08:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theDreamer (Post 2443573)
No one has results of the JUN cams, the guy in Guam does not have a dyno so cannot see if there are results. Another set that went to the UAE I believe never got installed as he went for boost.
Also, the car JUN posted was using higher octane fuel AND higher compression (12:1 v 11:1 stock).
Yep, good, making sure I had the fact straight that there are no facts for the cams...

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370 (Post 2443628)
The cam and short tube header information for our cars is highly disappointing.
Such a shame...

kenchan 08-13-2013 08:35 AM
sodewhendoyouactuallygetyourcarback?

DEpointfive0 08-13-2013 08:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 2443657)
sodewhendoyouactuallygetyourcarback?
Either I agree to a $1400 head or find one for cheaper... So whenever I find one for cheaper

kenchan 08-13-2013 08:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEpointfive0 (Post 2443659)
Either I agree to a $1400 head or find one for cheaper... So whenever I find one for cheaper
:facepalm: :crying:

DEpointfive0 08-13-2013 08:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 2443660)
:facepalm: :crying:
Courtesy advertises it for $1044, so I want to see if a vendor can do better

kenchan 08-13-2013 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEpointfive0 (Post 2443663)
Courtesy advertises it for $1044, so I want to see if a vendor can do better
that's a lot better. maybe westcoast nissan scott (I think his name was scott) can help you out?

DEpointfive0 08-13-2013 08:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 2443671)
that's a lot better. maybe westcoast nissan scott (I think his name was scott) can help you out?
... That's Fontana Nissan, the dealership the car is at... LOL!!!

And I don't want in-state because I gotta pay 8-9% sales tax on it too

theDreamer 08-13-2013 08:47 AM
Maybe talk to Lou Fusz?

DEpointfive0 08-13-2013 08:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theDreamer (Post 2443682)
Maybe talk to Lou Fusz?
As we speak, lol

theDreamer 08-13-2013 08:53 AM
Just be careful, he might be cheaper but there are "hidden" costs. :wtf2:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.
Page 5 of 10 « First 34 5 67 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2