![]() |
If that is true it is very disapointing. The body is a step the wrong way and certainly not a better looking body than the 370, which was the main sell for me. Even the 350Z was slightly less curvy but still way sexy. It would be nice if Nissan would boost power to close to 400hp next year (on base not Nismo) to compete with the mustang in my eye. I think even just adding DI next year would be a step in the right direction, then up displacement a bit.
If the original post pans out in 2015 I will either keep my 370z for much longer than planned or buy a new mustang. The fanged 370 body is hard to beat IMHO. Current Nismo 370 doesn't cut it for me personally, the goofy rediculous spoiler is laughable and small increase in performance, not worth the extra money....again just my oppinion, don't hate on that. |
It looks like Honda Accord coupe! lol.
350hp at 2016 is lame. They should say at least 400 hp by then. But to me, hp is not the biggest weak point Nissan need to address. It's the torque! Sexy/fast looking Z should be packed with at least 300Ib/ft. The solution to it is to turbocharge it! Come on Nissan, I've been waiting for a turbocharged v6 for too long! |
Nice. Will have to check out the 2014 auto show for concepts. Not sure why the reaction to the rendering. That's not final anyway. More likely closer to what will come around 2014. That's next year. For me, I'm due for a switch in 2017 = PERFECT!
|
Quote:
^^ This is how the 2020 Genesis Coupe will look like.... :icon18::icon18::icon18: |
The next Z is very very far away. Everything just speculation at this point, all pictures are just drawn renderings. Too early.
|
The rendering does not look right to begin with. It seems like there were two different points.
|
Not crazy about the rendering, but who knows what we'll actually see on display, let alone at dealerships.
Sorta disappointed to learn weight may not be coming down all that much. No special feeling on the type of motor -- what matters to me is power to weight, flat torque, and peak torque sooner than later. Mixed feelings on the presence or lack thereof of a turbo. It's much easier to get nice gains when you have factory boost. That turbo 4 may turn out to be a real beast with some modest upgrades. Then again, it's hard to say without knowing more details -- again, the key ones for me being power:weight. Still 3 more years to go. I can wait. |
Quote:
|
Not impressed with the stats for the upcoming Z in this article.
|
I'm no engine expert, but I'd trade "more horsepower" for "lighter weight" and "better torque;" something that makes me happy through all gears and rpms, rather than the low gears and sweet spots. That might mean turbo, but I wouldn't know since I've never driven a turbo car. >.<
I kinda like and don't like the rendering. That exaggerated headlight swoosh and quarter window point are awful, though. I *kinda* like that it looks like it was melted out of a block of ice, with lines created not via ridges but from curves. But that's really reaching. It otherwise has proportions like any ol' normal car, tbh. Depending on other view, this looks an awful lot like a smaller BMW. Thank again, I love the 370 styling so much I can fap out some of my own QD spray, and I'm not sure anything will be better without being a huge change. |
Quote:
|
I guess Im keeping my 2009!
|
I'll withhold any judgment on styling until we see the real thing, this is just a cobbled together pic for an article imo.
As far as them staying with an FM platform, it makes sense for a $$ saving perspective but it makes me a bit worried that it means verly little weight savings possibly and this car needs to shed an honest 100-200 lbs with similar power imo. If it comes in around the same or a little lighter than the 370 and has 350-380 hp I'll probably replace our nismo with the next gen nismo IF they address the biggest flaws the current car has: oil cooling, brake cooling, ice mode, fuel starve, lack of real lsd etc. I hope since Nissan seems to be getting more serious about racing etc that the next Z won't need major aftermarket stuff to be truly trackable out of the box. fingers crossed. |
Quote:
|
For "just under $35,000" the speculated specs will be a failure. The Z needs an overhaul if its going to be competitive at that price. People cross shop that with Mustang GTs and 3 series..design aside, I know I probably wouldn't pick the Z in 2016 if these specs turn out to be correct. At that point the new Mustang and Camaro platforms will be out. The Mustang has been rumored to be a couple hundred pounds lighter and possibly pushing 450hp. Some say the Z isn't necessarily a competitor of the muscle cars, but the consumers say otherwise.
With the refresh going back to the 350z front bumper, I think the next Z will have a much more conservative design approach. Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2 |
That will be a sad year for the Z. They've lost their roots. They need to compete with the FRS/BRZ, get rid of VVEL, join the direct injection club and crush the 350hp range. And they need to start offering serious factory spec upgrades like the Mustang al a carte menu. Holy crap, every single stang out there is different from the next. They have become so personalized and "custom" straight from the factory that there is no need to mess with them. And they are looking damn good too. They still drive like boats but they are quickly coming along in terms of design. If Nissan took this approach and even offered a factory Z (GT type) vehicle pushing 550hp, they would certainly garner some attention. But let's face it. They're lazy. They don't want to put in the work or the effort to really create something special. They want to use an existing frame of a much larger vehicle. IMO, that is just bad business. At this rate, Hyundai is on track to crush the Z with their Genesis. Yup... I said it!
But if the Toyota Supra makes its way back into the market I'll be first in line. Not sure I'd let the Z go but she'll certainly remain undriven for extended period of time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its nice to brag at Cars and Coffee about your hp numbers but for the real world 330+ is a serious amount of power. Period. |
That concept design looks hideous...
|
Quote:
|
Concept drawings never look ANYTHING like the final design. All I hope is that they hire the same designer (I forget his name ATM) who designed the 370z, because I trust his design skills after putting out this sexy machine.
|
I hate it I don't understand why all These articles keep insisting on bringing the z back to its Datsun days.... Those days are long gone the z has evolved into something great why knock it down from a mid range sports car to an entry level sports car? Why wouldn't they just revive the s chassis? Leave the z alone don't kill it
|
Quote:
|
I actually wouldnt mind a turbo 4 banger, but that grill rendering suuuuuuucks. looks like an altima/maxima :shakes head:
|
This is NOT a High HP discussion thread!!
Lets Keep It On Topic! Thank You |
Still looks like a BRZ...
Bad Rendering Z |
Looks like a Genesis Coupe.
I don't like it. |
+ power - weight - price = success
|
I'm going to speculate that most of this guy's speculation is just speculative and wrong. There, I said it.
|
Quote:
|
Keep the rims, ditch the rest and start over.....
|
I know i want Ray's and Akebono to still handle our wheel and brake package.
|
I'm all for having a Cayman S or 991 variant as a benchmark. I don't care how they get there, so long as the result is comparable. I'm also all for an evolutionary design as opposed to a retro or all new. Nissan did create the GTR and it rapes everything under $400k. I trust they will make the Z special as they say.
|
Agree with SS above. I would love the body style to evolve rather than change. I also don't mind the price remaining the same if there are performance increases in all categories. I like the exclusivity of our Z's.
|
As far as design, I want in the middle of revolutionary and evolutionary. I want the Z to keep it's 240z original identity while bringing something completely new to the design. Not just a glorified exterior refresh...
Everything else that SS said. I'm with. |
Quote:
|
The price isn't the problem, the people wanted something to look good and sound good but not be really that good. Quality, people, costs money. Which is why the 370Z costs more than the 350Z. Bigger engine, better interior, more hp/tq, bigger brakes, better technology! You won't get that sh¡t for the same price from the last model. Try to be more realistic please! I mean come on... 35K for the best dollar/performance sports car is NOT bad. I'm about to go out and drive my 370Z and love it, you guys go ahead and stare in misery at yours.....
|
Quote:
You can look throughout all of the Z history, and most other car lines for that matter, how price (and everything else that goes with it, including quality) affects purchasing. When the Z originally hit the American market, it was essentially today's Toyobaru with an inline six. Cheap car, small revvy engine, great handling. The reason the 300z ended with a hiatus was specifically because it became too expensive. It was more luxurious, it was absolutely more powerful, but it wasn't what the Z was originally about. Consider this, the Toyobaru twins have a weak 4 banger engine, terrible interior, and few options. But they are flying out of the showrooms. You don't think that has anything to do with price? That is why you see a lot of people saying the 370z should compete with the Toyobaru twins, because they epitomize what the 240z was. The reality is that time has passed, the Z is a different type of car now, but $42k for a fully optioned Z and $45k for a Nismo, are easily $5k more than they should be. It doesn't make the Z a bad car, just an expensive one. |
Well put ^^
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2