Quote:
Quote:
|
Today here and now the Z is the best in its class. Can you get faster straight line performance for the money, sure. But this car is the total package. Sure the interior can benefit from richer appointments, but are these essential for what this car is? IMO, no. The Z outperforms or is on par with cars much higher in cost, and it is much more than the Gen, 86, and the domestics. And its sexy as hell. It's not because I have one...its why I got one. So what's next? Nissan says performance...a better Nismo and an RS model. Will it happen? Your guess is as good as mine...but at least they're speaking my language. And that's very promising!http://img.tapatalk.com/4cad6968-0164-85fa.jpghttps://m.facebook.com/?refsrc=http%...user=606345512
|
Quote:
didnt aim to offend anyone here, just my own experience with my Z i find it very hard to open up that center console accidentally unless i am full on leaning on the thing, as for features i'm pretty sure nissan is working on upgrading the features across their entire line up as evidenced by the new 2013 altima which now comes standard with blue tooth even on the base models, wouldnt be suprised to see the next Z get a few upgrades in that area as well. honestly though as mentioned by others already i have no interest in a whole bunch of upgraded stereo equipment and electronics in a sports car. while it is nice to have the option of having that i dont think it should make or break the deal as the reviewer suggests by pointing to other comparable cars that have those options as standard. heck i would bet that is the reason why the gen coupes are heavier than the Z's is because of all that extra electronics that they bundle along with them as standard. in any case its just my opinion by itself and nissan will ultimately do what it thinks the consumers want which is fine by me...i just hope they still make a base+sport model on the next generation of the Z's that has as little electronics as possible. |
Quote:
OTOH the price has crept up a bit over the years without adding significant changes to really justify the added premium. In that regard I think the Motor Trend article does have a valid point, but even still...I wouldn't trade my Z for any of those other cars mentioned. |
The author seems to be critical without saying anything untrue. Is the glass half full or half empty. In this case, half empty.
I don't recall the lack of oil cooler being mentioned either. So he could have been more critical. on the plus side ...These shortcomings are redeemed somewhat once the Z is given room to gallop. |
All the comments about the interior being outdated and the lack of features are easily solved by getting the touring package.
I've driven a 2013 Altima and the improvements they've made on the interior are amazing! I can't wait to see what they do with the interior of the next Z, it should look even better. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
the fact that he is comparing 2013 cars to a car that hasn't changed significantly since it's intro in 2009 says a lot. aside from it's performance, the Z is just gorgeous. Plus, you don't see many of them compared to Camaros and Mustangs.
|
The 370Z is in a particularly tough position. It has too many competitors because it offers so much at an affordable price range. For starters, it's often compared to cars that cost nearly twice as much like the Cayman/Boxster(if you have the vert), BMW Z4, and even the Audi TT. Because the Z is able to compete with them performance wise, they in turn become competitors. But the Z always fall short of quality and branding. Then we have cars like the Mustang, Camaro, and now the BRZ/FRS which are all in the same price range, so these in turn become competitors. But unlike the Z, the muscle cars lack the handling and percision, and in case of the BRZ/FRS it lacks the power. And somehow out of all that, the Z is considered overpriced. It is also worth noting the Z has the better interior of these cars, but that's just my opinion. The Z is a great overall package for consumers at 30k, but its a downfall for magazine editors to pick apart. |
He was comparing it to the slow mustang and camaro btw.
Anyways the whole brz/frs love is just because it's new. Go dig up some reviews of the 2009 Z, everyone loved the car back then. It's mostly nissan's fault for not updating the platform enough to justify the price. If subaru is smart and makes a sti brz expect the fanboyism to continue |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2