GTR looks too much like a late model eclipse, fail!

Can't beat the prius from 0-6mph. :roflpuke2:

At first glance, the GT-R looks like a family sedan to me. Saw one on the road last week and had to do a double take.

I have never understood why Nissan didn't give it a snazzier body kit advertising the beast inside.

Edit: That said, if you can afford the 110k entry price (after tax) of the GT-R, you can probably afford a very nice body kit.

Lmao @ voting on a 370Z site

370z wins the look hands down.

I would say the 370Z is BETTER looking, but the GT-R is BADDER looking.....MUCH badder!

This makes no sense lol. :tup:

The GTR is a little chunky looking. If it didn't do sub 3 second 0-60 launches, I wouldn't really care about it.

beauty, without thinking about HP or times... we only love it because it has Veyron level acceleration

Fun question! It's like asking someone, who's body do you prefer more, Jessica Alba or Jessica Biel? :excited: I know which one I'd choose, but I'd never talk negative about the other. ;)

Very subjective poll. The GT-R has physical PRESENCE. The 370Z has SEXY lines. Everything inside and outside of the GT-R is all about business...it's all about the function of going fast. Aesthetics took a back seat in its design. Having said that, it's a great looking car...just the lines aren't as curvy sexy as the Z.

I hate the tail lights on the GTR, but like the side profile. The tail lights remind me of a GM Monte Carlo or something similar.

I would rather go slower with the sleek, sexy car than hard and fast with the ugly one.

Big brother....little brother. Have the Z want the GTR