Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   370Z computer consistently overestimates MPG (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/31161-370z-computer-consistently-overestimates-mpg.html)

Xenops 02-03-2011 07:53 PM

370Z computer consistently overestimates MPG
 
I have a 2010 370Z bought almost 1 year ago. I save my gas fill-up information at Fuelly.com. For the first few months the Fuelly MPG calculations matched the Z computer calculations. Now the Z computer consistently overestimates the MPG by .5 to 1 MPG. Anyone else seen this?

Will

m4a1mustang 02-03-2011 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xenops (Post 925738)
I have a 2010 370Z bought almost 1 year ago. I save my gas fill-up information at Fuelly.com. For the first few months the Fuelly MPG calculations matched the Z computer calculations. Now the Z computer consistently overestimates the MPG by .5 to 1 MPG. Anyone else seen this?

Will

The computer estimate is just that... an estimate. The only way to accurately calculate your mileage is the old fashioned way. :tup:

GZ3 02-03-2011 08:26 PM

its constantly adjusting to you driving style,

TreeSemdyZee 02-03-2011 09:42 PM

You also have to take into consideration that as your tires wear down, the numbers will change. As the tires wear the travel distance for one revolution is less than it was when they were brand new.

spearfish25 02-03-2011 09:54 PM

Not sure tire wear would explain it. Tire wear would affect the odometer in both cases (computer calculation and owner calculation). The variable is how much perceived consumption is occurring. More likely is that the tank doesn't fill to the same level every time. Every pump is different and the filling trigger may go off at different tank levels.

For example, say you drove 350 miles on a tank of gas. If you fill up and get 17 gallons in the tank, your MPG is 350/17=20.6mpg. Now say a different pump was used and put in 17.4 gallons (or you topped it off a little). The same calculation gives 350/17.4=20.1mpg. There's a 0.5mpg difference for ya.

mick 02-03-2011 10:36 PM

according to my calculations, i only get about 15 mpg :)

miles driven/gallons consumed = 15 mpg

driven mostly in the city.

Skeeterbop 02-04-2011 08:54 AM

Hey Spear, wouldn't the onboard estimate be able to calculate based on fuel being used? I know if I was the person who set it up, I would pull info from the ecu to get as precise an estimate as possible. That way it wouldn't matter if the tank got filled half way or all the way to the brim. I'm just wondering here. Maybe somebody will know how the onboard estimate is calculated.

spearfish25 02-04-2011 10:42 AM

^The discrepancy is more in the manual calculation when you try to figure out how much you put in and burn. The car does read from fuel flow (I think), so it's probably the more reliable of the two methods.

MY1STZ 02-04-2011 10:59 AM

I have an 09 and my computer has been UNDER-ESTIMATING w/in .5-1.0. I'm getting better MPG's than the computer states and thats better for me.

kenchan 02-04-2011 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GZ3 (Post 925786)
its constantly adjusting to you driving style,

+ how much you eat/weigh. :icon17:

mick 02-04-2011 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 926586)
+ how much you eat/weigh. :icon17:

in the end, gas mileage isn't a big concern for the both of us i think.
according to my calculations, i am going to fill up the gas tank twice or three times in 2011 based upon my driving habit. i filled up the gas tank at the beginning of the year and have only driven 90 miles to date :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2