![]() |
Quote:
That said, I say keep the Z. |
sorry but no way i buy or trade for a dodge of any kind.
|
I've always loved the Challengers and still consider trading the Z in on one. But I picked the Z over the Challenger because it felt to big, to bulky and slow. (I was looking at an R/T) They are beautiful looking cars and the interior isn't totally awful but you can feel its size. Going from a Z to a Challenger would feel like you're getting into a 18 Wheeler. Its a great car for cruising down main street, but its not a good car when trying go around a turn. Its a tough call though man
|
Need a family car? Get the challenger. Don't need a family keep the Z
|
I just got done driving a challenger (10 days) from Enterprise rental. It was a base model no hemi. My opinion, if you like driving a boat that people think is a Camaro that doesn't really go fast then do it. It does drive nice, but it certainly doesn't compare with the feeling of driving my Z. The higher powered versions might be faster, but they're probably just as bulky and still feel like your driving an overstuffed couch.
It suffers from the same, although lesser, problem that the Mustang has. There are too many of them on the road, and they all look the same no matter what's under the hood. |
Holy crap, I didn't even read your post.... just the thread title.
I would never... ever... ever... ever... ever ever everrrrr trade my Z in on a Challenger. If there is any car I hate... it is that. They are ugly, heavy, expensive, slow and made from left over Chrysler parts. I can't believe anyone would literally want to own one of those tanks. Now, scrolling down to click the quick reply button I noticed a picture of a 5.0 badge. That is the only car I would trade my Z in on... and I'll never do that. Sorry for the off topic / hate rant. Good evening fellas! |
Quote:
|
If you like your Z, I would think you would hate the challenger. It weighs a LOT.
No, I doubt it runs a 12.4. Probably a mid/high 12 with a 110-112 trap. The 425bhp versions didn't run but HIGH 12's and more normally low 13's@108 or so. |
you should totally trade it.
don't be so selfish, think of the kids. |
Quote:
wow I didnt know that... that is very impressive ... 12.4 bone stock huh |
pfff. IF you are going to trade your Z in for an american muscle car get the 5.0 that is the only american car I would trade it in for.
|
Quote:
|
What's wrong with a 12.4 at 110? The new challenger is a beast from a dig. You know, kind of like how my 2003 Mustang GT would rape know-it-alls in their LS1s to 60 mph.
Gobble! |
Quote:
Nothing at ALL is wrong with his 12.4@110, I personally think that is sick, I am just leery of the average joe doing it. I know it's an auto, it just seems like he would have to have a 1.7-1.8 60' to pull down numbers like that, and I have not see many factory automatic RWD cars in that price-range lay down a 1.7-1.8 bone stock. Who knows? Maybe the track was prepped awesome. I heard NO sqeak on the shifts. *Back when the '05 GT came out, my dealership was one of the first in town to get one. Of course, we did things with it that we probably shouldn't have (nothing crazy like powerslides or anything, just a bit of a romp). When we hit 2nd gear, it left about 5' of rubber. I was shocked that it was so traction limited. Ford put 235's Pirelli's that were M&S rated. A completely unforgivable mistake in my opinion. Gobble gobble? |
seriously... we're talking about your ws6 again, seriously? :wtf2:
OP, +1 for the new mustang instead. and someone asked about the 5spd manual in the challenger, i believe that is only on the v6 cars, the v8's get 6 spds iirc, at least i know the SRT's do (which is the only one to have right?... right?) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2