![]() |
If we're comparing muscle cars to muscle cars, I think the GT is better looking than the Camaro or Challenger. Purely subjective, of course.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://images.thecarconnection.com/l...00303262_l.jpg |
:facepalm:
|
Quote:
|
It's like... why add fuel to the fire? :shakes head:
|
The only thing ugly about that engine bay is the valve covers. That is honestly my only problem with the car. "Powered by Ford"... I mean what is this nonsense?!?! How about just black covers?
Also, on the 'hockey puck' thing in the rear.... that's not how you open the trunk is it? Because I was looking at it up close and I swear you can see the glue (or bonding material) to keep it attached to the rear panel. I think the 5.0 would look a LOT cleaner in the rear if you could remove it. Just my .02. |
You know a car kicks *** when people are having to resort to whining about mundane things like what's written on the valve-covers.
+1 to Ford |
Quote:
|
What's the old saying? Opinions are like ***holes... everyone's got one?
This debate will never end. Everyone needs to accept that they are both great cars. People will find pro's and con's to ANY car. We just need to be thankful that auto manufacturers still continue to make great sports cars for us gearheads, despite this economy and despite the strive towards everything "green" and electric. Go Ford AND Nissan ;) Let's enjoy them while we can. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Agree... our cars are great, but not THAT great :) But hey, it's great to ME, and that's all that matters. Good hearted discussion is always fine and actually can be a lot of fun. I see you own a PW Z as well... that's the ONLY reason why I am agreeing with you! hehe... :p |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2