yea and I had heard 0 60 in 3.5 for it but dont know if that is true.

The new V does 0-60 in 4.2, 3.9 with roll-out.

the CTS-V is a refined luxury muscle car.

I give the CTS-V Coupe a lot of respect in the performance department, but the back end makes it look like a Prius or wagon/suv. It looks even worst in person.

http://www.thetorquereport.com/x08cc_ca017.jpg

I like the look of the whole car. Looks fast too.

Two WAY different cars, but I do appreciate posting your perspective.

Hard to compare, since both cars were built with two different priorities. Our Z is a sports car, so they've taking a bunch of stuff out AND stay within a price point. The Caddy is a luxury sedan first and they ADDED performance. I think both are great values (but I don't particularly like the chrome on the Caddy; though I think it would grow on my after I drive one).

Interesting - I like the coupe in pics. Gonna have to check one out on the lots (and get an excuse to visit a dealer showroom floor :rolleyes: ).

I bet it looks sick in black with dark tint

you see the 370z is faster because,

quick find

http://www.dfwcadillac.com/db_upload...07_Black_1.png

because its what I own.

Ok - you sold me. That's pure sex. I'm gonna drop by a dealership this weekend and check the coupes out while the wife shops. ;)

The Wagon for comparison:
http://www.cartype.com/pics/8139/ful...wagon_4_11.jpg

The CTS V Coupes are horrid looking.

I fully agree. I hate the looks and steriotype that go with the Caddy.