Best Sports Car 370Z from $25K-35K.
 

i'd have to say...i agree :D in some ways, im shocked the camaro made it on the list, that thing is a heavy heavy beast!

NO doubt the 370Z now and prior to that the 350Z are one of the best handling cars in that price range.

I beg to differ. The S2000 IMO would take that title.

:iagree: but its okay, they cant keep up on the straights at all. :driving:

Agreed. Coming from one I would know lol

We also have the most horsepower and the second highest torque, the highest being the Mustang

Where is the S2000 now for 2010? Out of the Honda line up!

It said price range not year range.
370Z>S2000>350Z

The article is about cars for 2009 and it says something about coupes.

It's a given since they only compared 2010 cars:shakes head:

One of you is obviously wrong. I was comparing the S2000 to the 350Z since he said it was the best car in that price range, WHEN THEY WERE BOTH OUT.

Papo- Last year of the S2000 was 2009, I didn't see the coupe part.
Lemer- I don't assume anything because we all know where that goes ;)

:roflpuke2: haha that is true

hope they would come up with something new and sexy

First I didn't say anything about assumptions. But I did see 2 cars on the list that don't have 2009 model years.

:tup:

Part of the article:

"Buying a great handling sporty car in this price range affords you one wonderful feature—rear wheel drive. It is a proven fact that driving pleasure increases when your vehicles push you (rear drive) instead of pull you (front drive). At this price point, however, most all of your choices are two door sports coupes. While this is by no means a bad thing if you want the handling benefits of all wheel drive in a sports sedan you have to usually have to budget a little extra for a BMW 3-series, Mercedes C-Class or Cadillac CTS—all of which are fine choices."

BTW, there are no 350Z or S2000 on that article. Not saying that they are good handling cars, but I'm refering to the article. ;)

:tup:

i didnt know there were other SPORTS CARS in this price range.... 4 seaters are coupes in my books (for family oriented grocery getter convenience). :D 'honey i cant afford a real sports car + dd, but i can afford a coupe that has 4 seats... can i get that?'

real sports cars are 2 seaters.

:iagree:

This article is so old, can we kill this, kill it now kill kill

no, we want to ensure the public understands that sports cars are 2 seaters.

you got 4 seats, that is not a sports car, it is a sport coupe for family oriented grocery getting fun. :D

waitup...dont GTR's seat 4...haha.

Exactly, it's a GT car.

the back seats in any of the 2 door Z competitors are totally useless. i dont even understand why they are a selling point. i mean, i do understand why they are a selling point, but they are so small and cramped that no one would ever want to sit in them.

i agree..the back seats in my old rx-8 were useless as well..

for this price range id seriously also consider an evo and sti as well...both seat four with 4 doors..hah!

I believe mustang claims their setup is a 2+2. Now in my world that equals 4, but in the car world I believe that means that the back seats are not ment for adults.

Those back seats on a RX-8 for example is for insurance purposes.

That will give the owner a lower insurance premium. ;)

i believe companies less worried about insurance and more worried about price point and marketing. 4 seats usable or not appeal to a greater number of buyer than 2 seats.