Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   Noob Fuel Question! (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/14241-noob-fuel-question.html)

Hugoneus 02-07-2010 10:21 PM

Noob Fuel Question!
 
Do you guys always put premium fuel in the 370Z? What happens if you put the regular basic fuel?

Thanks!

m4a1mustang 02-07-2010 10:25 PM

Our engines are designed to run on premium fuel. The higher octane rating means a higher resistance to premature detonation. I run 93, but some states offer only 91 as the highest octane and that will work.

If for some reason you have to put 87 in the car, go very easy on the revs as you don't want any pinging, and refill with high octane as soon as possible.

Sibze 02-07-2010 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 392452)
Our engines are designed to run on premium fuel. The higher octane rating means a higher resistance to premature detonation. I run 93, but some states offer only 91 as the highest octane and that will work.

If for some reason you have to put 87 in the car, go very easy on the revs as you don't want any pinging, and refill with high octane as soon as possible.

Is it not true that you would want to use 91 for pure performance though??? I know 93 is better on the engine however my understand is that the lower octane you CAN use in your car the more performance you will receive from the engine.

I could be totally wrong

kannibul 02-07-2010 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugoneus (Post 392446)
Do you guys always put premium fuel in the 370Z? What happens if you put the regular basic fuel?

Thanks!

The engine will esplode if you put anything less than 91octane in.

Sibze 02-07-2010 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kannibul (Post 392470)
The engine will esplode if you put anything less than 91octane in.

It'll esplode yo!

Hugoneus 02-07-2010 10:37 PM

Haha... I don't want the engine to esplode.

But all joking aside, beside performance, is there any reason not to put the cheapest basic gas in it?

kannibul 02-07-2010 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sibze (Post 392458)
Is it not true that you would want to use 91 for pure performance though??? I know 93 is better on the engine however my understand is that the lower octane you CAN use in your car the more performance you will receive from the engine.

I could be totally wrong

You are totally wrong, and 93 is not better.

Octane rating has everything to do with how slowly the fuel burns and how resistant it is to detonating under compression. Higher octane = slower burn/more resistant.

This is compensated by advancing the timing. The car is "programmed" to use 91 octane fuel, meaning the advanced timing is already active. Using higher octane gas yeilds no benefit as the car can't detect higher rated fuel. *(this is true of all vehicles!)

If the car detects knock, (either by detonation or by the fuel burning too quickly/early by using under-91 octane fuel), the car WILL retard the timing and enrichen the fuel map until the condition is minimized.

That said, it says PLAIN AS DAY in the manual to use 91 octane (or higher) gasoline (again, not because higher octane gas will increase performance, but because it's safer in the sense that it's less likely to knock/detonate), but in case of emergency you can use 87/89 octane, but do not fill the tank, do not drive the car "hard", and fill the tank with 91 as soon as it is available.

So, RTFM.

m4a1mustang 02-07-2010 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugoneus (Post 392490)
Haha... I don't want the engine to esplode.

But all joking aside, beside performance, is there any reason not to put the cheapest basic gas in it?

Well yes... you will blow up the engine with 87... premature detonation = bad!

m4a1mustang 02-07-2010 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kannibul (Post 392493)
You are totally wrong, and 93 is not better.

Octane rating has everything to do with how slowly the fuel burns and how resistant it is to detonating under compression. Higher octane = slower burn/more resistant.

This is compensated by advancing the timing. The car is "programmed" to use 91 octane fuel, meaning the advanced timing is already active. Using higher octane gas yeilds no benefit as the car can't detect higher rated fuel. *(this is true of all vehicles!)

If the car detects knock, (either by detonation or by the fuel burning too quickly/early by using under-91 octane fuel), the car WILL retard the timing and enrichen the fuel map until the condition is minimized.

That said, it says PLAIN AS DAY in the manual to use 91 octane (or higher) gasoline (again, not because higher octane gas will increase performance, but because it's safer in the sense that it's less likely to knock/detonate), but in case of emergency you can use 87/89 octane, but do not fill the tank, do not drive the car "hard", and fill the tank with 91 as soon as it is available.

So, RTFM.

+1

RTFM... Nice!!!

kannibul 02-07-2010 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugoneus (Post 392490)
Haha... I don't want the engine to esplode.

But all joking aside, beside performance, is there any reason not to put the cheapest basic gas in it?

I'm not joking. It will explode in the engine. It won't burn, it will explode.

It's called detonation, which is bad for an engine.

Sibze 02-07-2010 10:40 PM

He wasn't really joking. Don't use anything under 91... the engine is not made for it.

The hole idea behind the octane level is:

The higher the octane level the more pressure that will build before the fuel ignites. If not enough pressure builds your engine will basically misfire… It wont sounds very good.

Hugoneus 02-07-2010 10:42 PM

Ok, I understand now. Curse expensive fuel! Curse it to hell I say!
:shakes head:

Sibze 02-07-2010 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kannibul (Post 392493)
You are totally wrong, and 93 is not better.

Octane rating has everything to do with how slowly the fuel burns and how resistant it is to detonating under compression. Higher octane = slower burn/more resistant.

This is compensated by advancing the timing. The car is "programmed" to use 91 octane fuel, meaning the advanced timing is already active. Using higher octane gas yeilds no benefit as the car can't detect higher rated fuel. *(this is true of all vehicles!)

If the car detects knock, (either by detonation or by the fuel burning too quickly/early by using under-91 octane fuel), the car WILL retard the timing and enrichen the fuel map until the condition is minimized.

That said, it says PLAIN AS DAY in the manual to use 91 octane (or higher) gasoline (again, not because higher octane gas will increase performance, but because it's safer in the sense that it's less likely to knock/detonate), but in case of emergency you can use 87/89 octane, but do not fill the tank, do not drive the car "hard", and fill the tank with 91 as soon as it is available.

So, RTFM.



OK WOW WOW WOW WOW

Is that not what I said??? Because thats what I meant...

93 would burn cleaner IE be better for the engine... 91 WILL GIVE YOU BETTER performance...


No????

m4a1mustang 02-07-2010 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugoneus (Post 392506)
Ok, I understand now. Curse expensive fuel! Curse it to hell I say!
:shakes head:

Blame it on Lindsay Lohan, that bitch! :shakes head:

Trips 02-07-2010 10:43 PM

Heres a thread on this topic, a simple search is all it took!!!!
http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-g...o-you-put.html

Sibze 02-07-2010 10:44 PM

"""Originally Posted by Sibze
Is it not true that you would want to use 91 for pure performance though??? """""


By this I mean just fin use 91 :)

Hugoneus 02-07-2010 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple's (Post 392510)
Heres a thread on this topic, a simple search is all it took!!!!
http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-g...o-you-put.html

I did do a search, but I couldn't find something immediately. Thank you for posting the link.

kannibul 02-07-2010 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sibze (Post 392498)
He wasn't really joking. Don't use anything under 91... the engine is not made for it.

The hole idea behind the octane level is:

The higher the octane level the more pressure that it can withstand before the fuel self-ignites. If enough pressure builds your engine will basically start burning before the piston reaches optimum position, causing the engine to "jerk" internally… It wont sounds very good.

Also it burns at a slower rate, so in a vehicle that requires 87 octane there is the potential that running higher octane fuel (or high enough, say 110 octane race fuel) will result in unburned fuel leaving the combustion chamber (ie, less power) and going into your catalytic converters, eventually clogging them (a lot less power)


Fixed

Sibze 02-07-2010 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kannibul (Post 392518)
Fixed

lol ok thats what I was trying to say...


Whatever...


USE 91 PEOPLE

kannibul 02-07-2010 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sibze (Post 392513)
"""Originally Posted by Sibze
Is it not true that you would want to use 91 for pure performance though??? """""


By this I mean just fin use 91 :)

Use 91. The whole car *is* pure performance. There are no exceptions with the car stock or with bolt-ons.

The only exceptions would be an ECU tune (when they finally crack it well enough to advance the timing further), or forced-induction.

End of topic!

Sibze 02-07-2010 10:53 PM

On this topic that we have moved to…

In Canada the highest octane that we can get is 93 at Sunoco. They have a points program and give you a butt load more points if you fill up with 93.

Downsides of using 93?

kannibul 02-07-2010 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sibze (Post 392531)
On this topic that we have moved to…

In Canada the highest octane that we can get is 93 at Sunoco. They have a points program and give you a butt load more points if you fill up with 93.

Downsides of using 93?

Cost. There aren't any gains to be had with using 93 over 91, short of an ECU tune or Force Induction.

That said, sometimes gas stations get batches that are under or over rated.

There are stickers on the pumps here in the US (not sure in Canada) that show a test date, and a +/- rating on 87 and 91 octane fuels. I've seen some test 87 octane as high as +5 (meaning it's 92 octane that day, that month), and as low as -2. 91, I'm just now paying attention do since the Z. I've seen a few say +2, others 0. Here, the gas is tested annually, so...they could go cheap and put crap gas in the tanks after their testing. Depends on the owner...the bigger corporate-owned places tend to be better (also go to the busy stations, they cycle fuels faster!), but the one-off ma-n-pa no-brand / small chain gas stations are the worst about it. They tend to get whatever gas they can get the cheapest when they need it most.

They don't test 89 octane here because it's really just 91 and 87 mixed in the pump.

Lastly, if you see the fuel truck at a gas station, don't get gas there that day. Sure it's the "freshest" and least likely to have any collected moisture in the fuel, but, all that fuel dumping into their storage tanks, stirs up sediment and out the pumps it goes into your tank, into your filter. Wait a day... :)

Sibze 02-07-2010 11:05 PM

Thanks!

I will have to work out the points difference and see if its worth it... however I am going to go out on a limb and say it wont be worth it...

Xan 02-07-2010 11:18 PM

Kannibul basically has everything covered.

The only things I can add is, on top of fuel not always being exactly as posted, hot outside temperatures could also induce knock and have your ecu retard timing.
Although the inlet air temp map will most likely be retarding the timing to prevent this, higher octane fuel could help here to reduce that effect.

Also certain types of molecules that mid and regular fuels contain do not exist in premium fuel, therefore premium fuels leave less deposits.

Finally as all major companies have their own additives to prevent build up, but in their process build up themselves, it can't hurt to switch brands every 3000 miles or so.
(although some companies buy their additives from others, so it won't work then)
The principle behind this is that one brands additive will remove the other and switching prevents maximum build up.
(I don't have any prove of this, maybe someone else has seen research on this? But it makes sense to my and it can't hurt)

kannibul 02-07-2010 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sibze (Post 392508)
OK WOW WOW WOW WOW

Is that not what I said??? Because thats what I meant...

93 would burn cleaner IE be better for the engine... 91 WILL GIVE YOU BETTER performance...


No????

No. 93 would not burn cleaner. It would burn less efficiently. However, with the variance in fuels being delivered to a given gas station it would give you more "wiggle room" before it would trip off the knock sensor, which would be even less efficient.

With 93 octane, you could be wasting a minute percentage of unburned fuel out your exhaust. For the most part, I would say negligable, but, you're referring to what percentage of the fuel is "octane" vs "heptane" - 91 octane is 91% octane, 9% heptane. 87 octane is 13% heptane, 87% octane.

Over 100%, it's based on some other method, and they use something otherthan octane to get it there, obviously, since you have have 101% (or higher) octane.

kannibul 02-07-2010 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sibze (Post 392546)
Thanks!

I will have to work out the points difference and see if its worth it... however I am going to go out on a limb and say it wont be worth it...

Generally isn't. They must be having a hard time selling 93 octane to offer some kind of kickback system...but like a casino, the house always wins...

(former gas station manager) :)

kannibul 02-07-2010 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xan (Post 392556)
Kannibul basically has everything covered.

The only things I can add is, on top of fuel not always being exactly as posted, hot outside temperatures could also induce knock and have your ecu retard timing.
Although the inlet air temp map will most likely be retarding the timing to prevent this, higher octane fuel could help here to reduce that effect.

Also certain types of molecules that mid and regular fuels contain do not exist in premium fuel, therefore premium fuels leave less deposits.

Finally as all major companies have their own additives to prevent build up, but in their process build up themselves, it can't hurt to switch brands every 3000 miles or so.
(although some companies buy their additives from others, so it won't work then)
The principle behind this is that one brands additive will remove the other and switching prevents maximum build up.
(I don't have any prove of this, maybe someone else has seen research on this? But it makes sense to my and it can't hurt)

Right, I wasn't accounting for air temperatures and effects of cold air intakes and so on.

The part on less fuel deposits with premium fuels (in general), I don't believe that is true. I do know that different companies put in different additives, however those additives are done at the distribution station...the company requesting the fuel can request their "special recipe" and it gets mixed as the truck is getting filled up. That being said, it's about the same (generalization!) as putting in BRAND X fuel injector cleaner with a tank full of gas, vs a can of BRAND Y fuel injector cleaner. The levels of additives are in the extreme less than 0.01%. Not like with engine oil....

Also, if anything you'll end up with more carbon deposits if you use premium fuel in a non-premium-required-vehicle.

Xan 02-08-2010 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kannibul (Post 392578)
....

Also, if anything you'll end up with more carbon deposits if you use premium fuel in a non-premium-required-vehicle.

For non premium required vehicles that's true if you get a incomplete burn.

However if it does burn, premium fuels burn cleaner then non premium.

I don't know the Nissan ECU (but will be putting some time into this in the future), but for Jaguar's ECU's the advance timing map went well above the minimum octane spec in advancing timing under heavy load and has build in algorithms that take care of the ignition learning. So assuming that Nissan (or who makes their ECU's) do a similar thing, it actually would make a difference to use higher octane fuels.

IDZRVIT 02-08-2010 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sibze (Post 392531)
On this topic that we have moved to…

In Canada the highest octane that we can get is 93 at Sunoco. They have a points program and give you a butt load more points if you fill up with 93.

Downsides of using 93?

There are gas stations in Toronto and Montreal that now have 94 octane.

kannibul 02-08-2010 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xan (Post 392632)
For non premium required vehicles that's true if you get a incomplete burn.

However if it does burn, premium fuels burn cleaner then non premium.

I don't know the Nissan ECU (but will be putting some time into this in the future), but for Jaguar's ECU's the advance timing map went well above the minimum octane spec in advancing timing under heavy load and has build in algorithms that take care of the ignition learning. So assuming that Nissan (or who makes their ECU's) do a similar thing, it actually would make a difference to use higher octane fuels.

AFAIK, there are no ECU's that will advance timing (further) to compensate for higher octane fuels than required.

Xan 02-08-2010 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kannibul (Post 392715)
AFAIK, there are no ECU's that will advance timing (further) to compensate for higher octane fuels than required.

It's been 10 years since I worked at engine calibration at Jaguar, but I do remember the production tune we made was able to work in a wider operating area dependend on fuel rating/quality both upwards and downwards.

Active Ignition Timing
A nice write up of the principle used by others.

tvfreakazoid 02-08-2010 09:27 PM

i'm curious could you run a 100octane? There is a local 76gas station that sells them.

Xan 02-08-2010 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tvfreakazoid (Post 393813)
i'm curious could you run a 100octane? There is a local 76gas station that sells them.

Waste of money, unless you're running a tuned engine with enough compression/FI.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2