Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   The Photobucket issue (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/122856-photobucket-issue.html)

JustinP 07-25-2017 11:39 AM

The Photobucket issue
 
Is www.the370z.com going to pay the (extortionist fees) of $399 a year so that all the photos in these highly informative posts aren't lost?

I'm looking to make some modifications in the coming weeks, specifically upgrading my brake lines to SS. Pictures would really help.

Has anyone heard? Lots of information is going to be lost if the board doesn't pay.

Ommateal 07-25-2017 12:09 PM

Super wondering about this as well. It would really be a bummer to lose all the amazing pictures and work people have done to get us this info.

Better start pushing them 'the370.com' stickers hard haha.

DeliriousClam 07-25-2017 12:26 PM

I'd say wait it out. Photobucket will realize they dun goofed soon

JustinP 07-25-2017 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeliriousClam (Post 3678489)
I'd say wait it out. Photobucket will realize they dun goofed soon

I sure do hope so. Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet is a great option.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ommateal (Post 3678483)
Super wondering about this as well. It would really be a bummer to lose all the amazing pictures and work people have done to get us this info.

Better start pushing them 'the370.com' stickers hard haha.

Yea, I'm a premier member for a little while now....still haven't gotten my sticker.:eekdance:

OhioYJ 07-25-2017 02:32 PM

Why would this site host images on a third party site anyways?

I pay ~$120 a year for my website, unlimited storage, I unlimited bandwidth. That's where my photos are stores and posted from.

It blows me away that so many businesses were using photobucket. This is probably why they set the price so high because they figure businesses will pay it. The average person was not going to pay anything anyways.

gomer_110 07-25-2017 02:42 PM

You all realize the pictures aren't truly gone just that the embedded feature doesn't work anymore, right? You can always right click the image that isn't showing up and select copy image address and paste it into a new tab.

I used photobucket for a while but in the last few years their site has gotten almost completely unusable due to ads. Do yourself a favor and move over to flickr.

Jayhovah 07-25-2017 02:44 PM

Is it the forum that needs to pony up? Or is it the individual account owners who have hosted their pictures? (I'd assume the latter).

Also, no way this site pays up for something like that when this site itself will allow you to host pictures.

cooltoy 07-25-2017 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gomer_110 (Post 3678547)
You all realize the pictures aren't truly gone just that the embedded feature doesn't work anymore, right? You can always right click the image that isn't showing up and select copy image address and paste it into a new tab.

Did not work. Did you try it?

One option is to go into users album by clicking user name, and do a slide show to view images.

gomer_110 07-25-2017 03:10 PM

Yep. Tried it and it worked just fine. I'm using Chrome as a browser for what it's worth.

*edit: Checked a few more and it seems like some work and some don't. Not sure what the difference between them is.

TreeSemdyZee 07-25-2017 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OhioYJ (Post 3678538)
Why would this site host images on a third party site anyways?

I pay ~$120 a year for my website, unlimited storage, I unlimited bandwidth. That's where my photos are stores and posted from.

It blows me away that so many businesses were using photobucket. This is probably why they set the price so high because they figure businesses will pay it. The average person was not going to pay anything anyways.

Third party hosting means that we have our pictures on Photobucket (or other) site and embed an IMG code in our posts.

TreeSemdyZee 07-25-2017 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gomer_110 (Post 3678547)
You all realize the pictures aren't truly gone just that the embedded feature doesn't work anymore, right? You can always right click the image that isn't showing up and select copy image address and paste it into a new tab.

I used photobucket for a while but in the last few years their site has gotten almost completely unusable due to ads. Do yourself a favor and move over to flickr.

Mine aren't...'cuz they hornked me off and I pulled them all off.

JARblue 07-25-2017 05:01 PM

This forum pays to host it's own storage, including hosting photos. There are size limitations yes, but you can upload either to individual posts or an album on this site. So why the hell would AK pay some other third party site to do what he's are already paying for?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustinP (Post 3678526)
Yea, I'm a premier member for a little while now....still haven't gotten my sticker.:eekdance:

AK is a busy guy and tries to get to those requests monthly. If it's been more than a month, go ahead and PM him again and let him know how long it's been. He'll get to it eventually; the best thing to do is just be patient and polite about it. I wouldn't PM him more than every two weeks.

OhioYJ 07-25-2017 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TreeSemdyZee (Post 3678575)
Third party hosting means that we have our pictures on Photobucket (or other) site and embed an IMG code in our posts.

I'm aware of what third party hosting means and what photobucket does, maybe the OP is not since he asked if this site was going to pay? This led me to believe this site was hosting images there as well, not just users. I'm on another forum that was doing that for some.images because they just didn't know any better.

So to make matters worse the whole situation is confusing people.

TreeSemdyZee 07-25-2017 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OhioYJ (Post 3678592)
I'm aware of what third party hosting means and what photobucket does, maybe the OP is not since he asked if this site was going to pay? This led me to believe this site was hosting images there as well, not just users. I'm on another forum that was doing that for some.images because they just didn't know any better.

So to make matters worse the whole situation is confusing people.

Gotcha.

Ticks me off that they just up and started charging with no warning that I'm aware of.
Hate being blindsided.

JustinP 07-25-2017 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OhioYJ (Post 3678592)
I'm aware of what third party hosting means and what photobucket does, maybe the OP is not since he asked if this site was going to pay? This led me to believe this site was hosting images there as well, not just users. I'm on another forum that was doing that for some.images because they just didn't know any better.



So to make matters worse the whole situation is confusing people.



Yep, I thought it was the site that would have to pay in order to allow the cross linking. I guess I'm wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2