![]() |
nismo dyno numbers
Nismo 370 WHP numbers.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2522/...ebe6dd9f_b.jpg 2007 350Z HR. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2623/...099cb141_b.jpg looks like the nismo puts out 10 more hp to the wheels. |
Good to know we're not that far from 300whp stock with the Nismos. Gives me a good idea of what I'll be after a few upgrades.
|
the torque numbers i think will always bother me :\
~295hp is great tho on a dynojet |
Quote:
:stirthepot: |
well if you are worried about torque numbers get a twin turbo Z32. those things make ridiculous amounts of torque.
Specialty tuned Z ECU Specialty Z 3" turbo back Light Weight Flywheel JWT Dual POP Charger Stock Turbos 740 cc Injectors 300 Degree fuel rail UR Pulley set boost controller intercoolers that'll get you around 470hp and around 520ft-lbs. to the wheels of course :) . |
This thread collapses into Z vs Camaro in 3 . . . 2 . . . 1 . . .
|
no no no lets not degrade ourselves to that and keep this nissan. All i have to say is there are guys here with just the sport package and three mods later are are near 320-330. Really the nismo isn't all that great:stirthepot:
|
Thing is with Nismo, you won't see big numbers (if any) from upgrading your catback.. so we're back to square 1
|
damn straight and nismo vs. sport it is!
|
Quote:
I think the hp difference between stock and Nismo is from the tune, not the CBE. Of course, I'm no expect, and it's certainly not anything more than my opinion. |
this is dynojet?
I wonder why mine only read 268whp/220t. must've been real cold where that was tested? a question, my lsd overheated a while back and needed it's oil replaced. could it have affected the numbers? |
:drama:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would LOVE to see what a normal 370z puts out on that dyno, because their stock 350z put out 257whp. So that's roughly a 30whp difference. Which is pretty close to the difference that a normal 370z has over a stock 350z. It is a bit higher though, so the numbers make sense. I think a normal 370z would've read in the 290 range on that dyno on that day.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
me dos :tup:
|
Quote:
280 + 18 (Nismo gain) = 298 w/o even taking in any drive train loss factor on the additional HP, the numbers add up pretty close. Assuming 17% loss 254 + 22 = 276 276 + 15 = 291 - or about what the OP got. :D |
Quote:
|
IMHO, the Camaro is butt-fugly in design to the 370. And, it's near comparing apples to oranges considering 2 seats > 4 seats.
Not saying the Camaro is a total waste. It can compare against other long-lived similar cars--to wit, the Mustang. But to put it in the same showcase as the 370... I don't think so. The G35/G37 and 350Z/370Z series designs are, well, just great. Not perfect, but great. When those designs came out, Nissan scored big. |
what does the 370 Nismo have that the Base or Touring doesn't have by way of power modifications?
|
Quote:
|
Ugh I hate these threads, I dont own a new camaro but seriously this ricer logic is somewhat bothering me. Because its American doesnt mean it sucks. Your logic is that American sucked in the past, for the most part this is true, but the LSX engine is proven.....Its a fantastic engine, thats great for mods, and has just as much reliability as a VQ...... if you leave both stock of course. Now I make this assumption on STOCK stats. IMO the camaro is a massive improvement over the old one and many other cars. Oh and also if you are under the impression that they cannot turn youd be wrong on that too. Now they are not a Z in handling but again HUGE improvment. The people that are bashing are the same people that bash on vette handling when a vette would DESTROY a Z in all performance aspects.
|
camaro vs 370?..lol. i like the camaro but its just a bad comparison imo.
|
i like the style of the camaro...but don't like the performance. aside from the handling factors..it takes a 6.2L v8 making 426hp to match the speed of the Z. Their 0-60 times are very close...5sec for the camaro and 4.7-5.1 for the Z
Edit: is it just me or does someone else see a problem with needing a 6.2L engine to make that???? waste of liters. |
^^camaro weighs at least 500lbs more than our cars..actually the ls motor is very light for its size..same motor as in the c6 vettes..anyhow it produces 420lbs tq...not too shabby..its a fun drive!
|
Quote:
|
Nice numbers! (Be careful about posting that link to another 370 forum tho.)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
AND, agree (as I think I posted earlier) especially with the remark on the style. :tup: |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Crappy dyno and operator. Couldn't get my tach signal right so my torque goes berserk after 5k or so. The fan in front of the car was terrible also, kept on low, with the AC off. Also very noisy, couldn't even hear my exhaust over the dyno itself really...
291.94HP / 248.28TQ http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1273152414 |
Nice numbers vipor! Unfortunately you can really see how bad the fan was, each run got the car much hotter and the fan looks like it did nothing. Regardless good runs you should be breaking 300whp with the LTH's.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Check out these Torque numbers! I didn't know I was driving a turbo diesel :eek:
http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1273153480 |
LOL. Wow, that's messed up. I also noticed that this operator has the correction factor set at STD instead of SAE. STD inflates the numbers over SAE.
|
Quote:
I'll be doing another few pulls before (and after) my headers. I was disappointed with the shop... $65 wasted. I'll go someplace less domestic next time. My biggest complaint was the cooling. My oil temps were over 220 and my water temp was higher than I'd ever seen it. I only did 3 pulls.... 32hp loss by the 3rd run wtf. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2