Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   nismo dyno numbers (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/11265-nismo-dyno-numbers.html)

Supergoji 11-16-2009 10:38 PM

nismo dyno numbers
 
Nismo 370 WHP numbers.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2522/...ebe6dd9f_b.jpg

2007 350Z HR.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2623/...099cb141_b.jpg




looks like the nismo puts out 10 more hp to the wheels.

Matt 11-16-2009 10:58 PM

Good to know we're not that far from 300whp stock with the Nismos. Gives me a good idea of what I'll be after a few upgrades.

vipor 11-16-2009 11:35 PM

the torque numbers i think will always bother me :\

~295hp is great tho on a dynojet

Matt 11-16-2009 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vipor (Post 283508)
the torque numbers i think will always bother me :\

~295hp is great tho on a dynojet

The new Camaro's have over 420 lbs/ft torque!!!

:stirthepot:

Supergoji 11-17-2009 02:13 AM

well if you are worried about torque numbers get a twin turbo Z32. those things make ridiculous amounts of torque.

Specialty tuned Z ECU
Specialty Z 3" turbo back
Light Weight Flywheel
JWT Dual POP Charger
Stock Turbos
740 cc Injectors
300 Degree fuel rail
UR Pulley set
boost controller
intercoolers

that'll get you around 470hp and around 520ft-lbs.
to the wheels of course :) .

CBRich 11-17-2009 05:52 AM

This thread collapses into Z vs Camaro in 3 . . . 2 . . . 1 . . .

1slow370 11-17-2009 06:44 AM

no no no lets not degrade ourselves to that and keep this nissan. All i have to say is there are guys here with just the sport package and three mods later are are near 320-330. Really the nismo isn't all that great:stirthepot:

G37Sam 11-17-2009 06:57 AM

Thing is with Nismo, you won't see big numbers (if any) from upgrading your catback.. so we're back to square 1

1slow370 11-17-2009 07:07 AM

damn straight and nismo vs. sport it is!

Matt 11-17-2009 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G37Sam (Post 283746)
Thing is with Nismo, you won't see big numbers (if any) from upgrading your catback.. so we're back to square 1

I think if I upgraded my CBE, I'd see a small gain in numbers. Looking at the Nismo CBE design, it's much closer to the stock CBE than Stillen/FI/etc designs. Would I expect a 20 whp gain? Nope, but I wouldn't be surprised by a 5-12 whp gain.

I think the hp difference between stock and Nismo is from the tune, not the CBE. Of course, I'm no expect, and it's certainly not anything more than my opinion.

Baddriver 11-17-2009 07:26 AM

this is dynojet?

I wonder why mine only read 268whp/220t. must've been real cold where that was tested?

a question, my lsd overheated a while back and needed it's oil replaced. could it have affected the numbers?

rcm2525 11-17-2009 07:28 AM

:drama:

AndyO 11-17-2009 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricky bobby (Post 283677)
maybe so but how does that camaro handle at 155 cuz the Z is pretty impressive :happydance:

Better than you would think.....

G37Sam 11-17-2009 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt (Post 283762)
I think if I upgraded my CBE, I'd see a small gain in numbers. Looking at the Nismo CBE design, it's much closer to the stock CBE than Stillen/FI/etc designs. Would I expect a 20 whp gain? Nope, but I wouldn't be surprised by a 5-12 whp gain.

I think the hp difference between stock and Nismo is from the tune, not the CBE. Of course, I'm no expect, and it's certainly not anything more than my opinion.

Respected my friend, I think it's more of a 50-50 though, a tune on it's own would barely yield anything without improved breathing

RCZ 11-17-2009 08:28 AM

I would LOVE to see what a normal 370z puts out on that dyno, because their stock 350z put out 257whp. So that's roughly a 30whp difference. Which is pretty close to the difference that a normal 370z has over a stock 350z. It is a bit higher though, so the numbers make sense. I think a normal 370z would've read in the 290 range on that dyno on that day.

vipor 11-17-2009 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1slow370 (Post 283738)
no no no lets not degrade ourselves to that and keep this nissan. All i have to say is there are guys here with just the sport package and three mods later are are near 320-330. Really the nismo isn't all that great:stirthepot:

the nismo was marketed slightly wrong is the issue. it's strictly looks and suspension. the exhaust and "ecu reflash" is very minor.

Matt 11-17-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vipor (Post 283823)
the nismo was marketed slightly wrong is the issue. it's strictly looks and suspension. the exhaust and "ecu reflash" is very minor.

I would have seriously considered the Nismo even if all it had were the cosmetic differences (inside and out). The other stuff was just a bonus for me! :rofl2:

vipor 11-17-2009 08:36 AM

me dos :tup:

Lug 11-17-2009 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 283820)
I would LOVE to see what a normal 370z puts out on that dyno, because their stock 350z put out 257whp. So that's roughly a 30whp difference. Which is pretty close to the difference that a normal 370z has over a stock 350z. It is a bit higher though, so the numbers make sense. I think a normal 370z would've read in the 290 range on that dyno on that day.

254 + 26 (350Z to 370Z HP gain) = 280

280 + 18 (Nismo gain) = 298

w/o even taking in any drive train loss factor on the additional HP, the numbers add up pretty close.

Assuming 17% loss

254 + 22 = 276

276 + 15 = 291 - or about what the OP got. :D

MindFusion FX 11-17-2009 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricky bobby (Post 283677)
maybe so but how does that camaro handle at 155 cuz the Z is pretty impressive :happydance:

and how far til it breaks down?

Slynky 11-17-2009 10:32 AM

IMHO, the Camaro is butt-fugly in design to the 370. And, it's near comparing apples to oranges considering 2 seats > 4 seats.

Not saying the Camaro is a total waste. It can compare against other long-lived similar cars--to wit, the Mustang. But to put it in the same showcase as the 370... I don't think so.

The G35/G37 and 350Z/370Z series designs are, well, just great. Not perfect, but great. When those designs came out, Nissan scored big.

ZKindaGuy 11-17-2009 11:21 AM

what does the 370 Nismo have that the Base or Touring doesn't have by way of power modifications?

Matt 11-17-2009 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZKindaGuy (Post 284182)
what does the 370 Nismo have that the Base or Touring doesn't have by way of power modifications?

A tune and CBE that, on paper, generate the 18 hp difference.

AndyO 11-17-2009 11:26 AM

Ugh I hate these threads, I dont own a new camaro but seriously this ricer logic is somewhat bothering me. Because its American doesnt mean it sucks. Your logic is that American sucked in the past, for the most part this is true, but the LSX engine is proven.....Its a fantastic engine, thats great for mods, and has just as much reliability as a VQ...... if you leave both stock of course. Now I make this assumption on STOCK stats. IMO the camaro is a massive improvement over the old one and many other cars. Oh and also if you are under the impression that they cannot turn youd be wrong on that too. Now they are not a Z in handling but again HUGE improvment. The people that are bashing are the same people that bash on vette handling when a vette would DESTROY a Z in all performance aspects.

wishihadnav 11-17-2009 11:35 AM

camaro vs 370?..lol. i like the camaro but its just a bad comparison imo.

MindFusion FX 11-17-2009 11:38 AM

i like the style of the camaro...but don't like the performance. aside from the handling factors..it takes a 6.2L v8 making 426hp to match the speed of the Z. Their 0-60 times are very close...5sec for the camaro and 4.7-5.1 for the Z

Edit: is it just me or does someone else see a problem with needing a 6.2L engine to make that???? waste of liters.

wishihadnav 11-17-2009 11:50 AM

^^camaro weighs at least 500lbs more than our cars..actually the ls motor is very light for its size..same motor as in the c6 vettes..anyhow it produces 420lbs tq...not too shabby..its a fun drive!

AndyO 11-17-2009 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wishihadnav (Post 284210)
^^camaro weighs at least 500lbs more than our cars..actually the ls motor is very light for its size..same motor as in the c6 vettes..anyhow it produces 420lbs tq...not too shabby..its a fun drive!

yes camaro weighs more, If u put the VQ in there it would be a 15 sec car. Not a waste of liters. Plus, just breath on the LSX and it will make more hp lol. The Camaro SS is no joke.

semtex 11-17-2009 12:57 PM

Nice numbers! (Be careful about posting that link to another 370 forum tho.)

ricky bobby 11-17-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyO (Post 284189)
Ugh I hate these threads, I dont own a new camaro but seriously this ricer logic is somewhat bothering me. Because its American doesnt mean it sucks. Your logic is that American sucked in the past, for the most part this is true, but the LSX engine is proven.....Its a fantastic engine, thats great for mods, and has just as much reliability as a VQ...... if you leave both stock of course. Now I make this assumption on STOCK stats. IMO the camaro is a massive improvement over the old one and many other cars. Oh and also if you are under the impression that they cannot turn youd be wrong on that too. Now they are not a Z in handling but again HUGE improvment. The people that are bashing are the same people that bash on vette handling when a vette would DESTROY a Z in all performance aspects.

easy easy im not saying the camaro sucks but at speed and on the run aerodynamics come into play. im sure the camaro would be great in the 1/4 mile but who drives a 1/4 mile at a time(except for Vin Diesel). The camaro n vette are great american cars and i agree the newest models are the best yet. But if not going in a straight line and if i could get my Z past 155-157 im gonna give the vette a helluva run. Besides that i dont think anyone here would dispute the beauty of the 370Z compared to the others. i'd rather build the Z and outrun them all. :happydance:

Slynky 11-17-2009 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricky bobby (Post 284507)
easy easy im not saying the camaro sucks but at speed and on the run aerodynamics come into play. im sure the camaro would be great in the 1/4 mile but who drives a 1/4 mile at a time(except for Vin Diesel). The camaro n vette are great american cars and i agree the newest models are the best yet. But if not going in a straight line and if i could get my Z past 155-157 im gonna give the vette a helluva run. Besides that i dont think anyone here would dispute the beauty of the 370Z compared to the others. i'd rather build the Z and outrun them all. :happydance:

LMAO at VD comment.

AND, agree (as I think I posted earlier) especially with the remark on the style. :tup:

Zsteve 11-17-2009 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt (Post 283521)
The new Camaro's have over 420 lbs/ft torque!!!

:stirthepot:

see what you started?!:nutswinger:

vipor 05-06-2010 08:27 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Crappy dyno and operator. Couldn't get my tach signal right so my torque goes berserk after 5k or so. The fan in front of the car was terrible also, kept on low, with the AC off. Also very noisy, couldn't even hear my exhaust over the dyno itself really...

291.94HP / 248.28TQ

http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1273152414

NYBladeZ 05-06-2010 08:43 AM

Nice numbers vipor! Unfortunately you can really see how bad the fan was, each run got the car much hotter and the fan looks like it did nothing. Regardless good runs you should be breaking 300whp with the LTH's.

vipor 05-06-2010 08:45 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Check out these Torque numbers! I didn't know I was driving a turbo diesel :eek:

http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1273153480

semtex 05-06-2010 08:54 AM

LOL. Wow, that's messed up. I also noticed that this operator has the correction factor set at STD instead of SAE. STD inflates the numbers over SAE.

vipor 05-06-2010 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 526884)
LOL. Wow, that's messed up. I also noticed that this operator has the correction factor set at STD instead of SAE. STD inflates the numbers over SAE.

Don't piss in my cheerios :mad:

I'll be doing another few pulls before (and after) my headers. I was disappointed with the shop... $65 wasted. I'll go someplace less domestic next time.

My biggest complaint was the cooling. My oil temps were over 220 and my water temp was higher than I'd ever seen it. I only did 3 pulls.... 32hp loss by the 3rd run wtf.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2