HP Rating NOT Really Overrated As Some Think
Just for the heck of it I decided to run some 370Z 1/4-mile track numbers I found on the Internet to see what the HP numbers calculate to using a HP calculator. Here is what I started with:
Best 1/4-mile time I found: 13.1 @ 108.9 MPH 370Z spec: Bone stock MT-6 Spec weight car is 3278 lbs empty car is 3285 lbs assuming 1 gallon of fuel. Best 1/4 mile time found: 13.1 seconds Assuming driver #1 weighs 180 pounds (the weight of an average man) the total weight at race time is: 3465 lbs Assuming driver #2 weighs 200 pounds (an above average weight) the total weight at race time is: 3485 lbs Calculation results: HP with driver #1: 326.94 HP at the flywheel HP with driver #2: 328.83 HP at the flywheel So my conclusion is that given the stated Nissan spec rating of 332 BHP the 1/4-mile track numbers tend to support such an OEM rating by +/- 4 HP. |
There were people who thought the HP was overrated?
|
Yeah, really.
|
Quote:
|
Still good info nonetheless.
|
I've carefully studied the supplied data and have come to one conclusion. I'm fat. :(
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
it means the extra weight would need 2 more hp to go that fast in the 1/4 mile
|
Quote:
HP is actually a function of weight. I know its confusing but think about it this way. The heavier the total load that is moving the greater HP is required to move the load in that given time over that given distance. It isn't that the engine is manufacturing more HP....its that the calculation formula figures the vehicle's HP to be "x" given the stated weight, time, speed and distance traveled. That is why the 1/4 mile is the truest indicator of what a car's HP is on any given run. |
Quote:
Here's a great (funny) article on the whole concept of weight Vs. speed.... SCC Technical Assistance Program |
Quote:
And believe it or not there are some Z folks (mostly 350Z folks) that think the 370Z HP is overrated. And there are a few car-magazines that I have seen it mentioned that whomever was doing the review felt that the 370Z may be overrated in HP. Needless to say what I showed in my example using actual trap data and the most conservative of assumptions the OEM specified HP for the 370Z has to be very accurate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Go to the drag section My 370 7 At ran 12.8009. on street tires. 19's/
i just missed 12.7 the car has bolts ons and i dynoed at 291.6 RWHP. The dyno read low. What horse power would you rate myt car at/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Either way though, depending on the boltons, seems like about right to me, though... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Assuming: 180# body weight assuming 1 gallon fuel and mods equal to OEM parts in weight = 3465 lbs total weight 343 crank HP which means your mods are netting you a real +10 HP gain at the flywheel. Forget the dyno crap because they are estimates at best. The track HP is the real truth of the matter as it is a test based on the real loads experienced by the vehicle. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I read somewhere else in these threads that they did a dynamometer test on a GT-R, and the results were 510hp, instead of 480!!! Hard to swallow, man!...???
|
Quote:
|
My base line dyno was 260.5 RWHP. with a warm engine. It made 266 on a cool engine.
all my #s are RWHP. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2