[QUOTE=sprtlvr;2015070]2010 40th used with 29,000 miles here in FLA...dealer not coming off $32k

or

2013 gun metallic base 6 spd coupe for $33k, 5 miles...

Hmmmmmm

Love the 40th anniv. model, but like idea of no previous miles on my first Z since 1986 300zx (digital dash!) that I wrecked in 2001 (boo).

Just opinion huntin'

Thanks!


Can't wait to post to 370z 'new owner' sticky :driving:

-
not a big fan of the 2013 front end but the 15's might be a real disaster, talking about a Juke platform maybe FWD<> a Z Honda

Now that Nissan screwed over the people who bought 40ths by giving red brake calipers and gun metallic rims on all 2013 models, I would go with the 2013. Only real difference is the red interior now.

leaning 2013
 

Yep, gun metallic 2013 + sports pack seems can get for $33,200...not shabby compared to $32k for 2010 40th...

saga continues with stealerships ;)

Thanks for input!

I got my 40th used with 28K miles for 29 grand out the door. If i had to pick between the 2013 and the 40th I would keep the 40th due to them being rare and Nissan only having made 1,000 of those units, plus the interior is way nicer. You can't argue with red leather and suede. 2013's do look nice though. I figure keeping the 40th at low miles and driving my wife's car will help keep its value as the years pass. Any other Z is still just another Z.

I too felt the same until I went to this meeting :tup:

And don't forget the 40th emblem :roflpuke2:

LOL a picture like that makes the 40th look disposable as Sh*t but the real value in it is the fact that they are limited. Putting thousands of Z's that are the same color isn't as exclusive as putting only 1,000 Z's that are 40th anniversary. I guess I just have too much love for the 40th. I love all 370's and would've settled for any Z (even automatic) but I saw this one and couldn't walk away from the deal. Im not hating, just trying to explain how these cars are numbered.