Quote:
|
Quote:
There basically the same. It would come down to driver. But to say it cant keep up is just stupid, especially since he was driving the auto which as I hate to say it is faster. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For some reason I cant find much info on the car, but I did find that it does 0-60 in the 5 second range slower then the Z. Whatever, I guess we should just get a stock WRX to reck them both huh? |
Not in a straight line.
Per the test I pulled up, both cars go 4.9 to 60. 13.4 for the z in sqm, 13.25 for the s5, which is actually gonna give you about 21 feet. Be careful comparing 0-60 times, since some are given with rollout and others aren't. Most of the really good (sub 5 second) z times are with rollout. |
Quote:
K so 0-60 is about the same which is sad since the Audi is AWD and has a ton more TQ and the quarter is close (thats one of the highest 1/4 times for a Z i have seen) Figure the S5 is about 10k+ more the my Z i say win to the Z. |
I'm not saying it's a better car. I would never consider an Audi. Just saying his claim isn't that far off base.
|
Well he says the Z cant keep up. On paper it looks like it would keep up pretty well. Keep up in my mind head means it could still lose but not by much. A STI VS a Stock SI there is a car that wont keep up (SI) Whateve.
|
The 370Z is pure sex! It is hot, loud, and rough!
|
Quote:
Prone to overheating just a couple minutes in More prone to grunt than to scream You think it's rough, because you don't know what you're missing :trollface: All in good fun before everyone gets their panties in a a bunch. Take a look at this guys past posts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And to think, I'm one of the guys that hasn't trashed you about buying the Mustang. Yet! :tup: |
lol you know this is an old thread if kannibul posted on the first page.
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2