while i was working in LA, we had CPA's coming during tax time. i called them California Public Accountants since they were so f-king clueless. :mad: :shakes head: :icon17:
speaking of taxes, we had problems filing online for some reason and we sent out our package back in late march.. UPSP showed 'sorted at xx facility' for 2 f-king weeks with no movement. :eekdance: finally yesterday it was delivered. :rolleyes:
I had a different issue with Brown Santa. While monitoring the shipping process an alert came on saying that my package was at a processing area but could not be found to send out. It arrived on time and the alert never did get remeved. For all I know they are still looking for it 5 months later.:eek:
kenchan
04-18-2013 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
(Post 2272964)
I had a different issue with Brown Santa. While monitoring the shipping process an alert came on saying that my package was at a processing area but could not be found to send out. It arrived on time and the alert never did get remeved. For all I know they are still looking for it 5 months later.:eek:
fire- huh, make a claim and get your money's worth. ;)
UPSP still hasn't delivered the wireharnesses that were lost a month ago... :ugh2:
Fire
04-18-2013 10:25 AM
I'm also a :postwhore: I blame this forum for both issues. :gtfo2:
Fire
04-18-2013 10:27 AM
I'm not one to take advantage of it. I would def. be going after them if I had not received my parts.
JARblue
04-18-2013 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZMan8
(Post 2272945)
I'm in a similar situation as your wife and definitely enjoying the transition from Public. Working ridiculous tax season hours was just not for me. I like work life balance.
I would say your wife is fine then for this test :tup:
I think one of the main reasons she is having better success at the exam this time around is because her stress level at work is so much lower. That and the hours are much shorter for half the year. Her former employer kept pushing for her to get her CPA license, but then when it came time to take her tests and she asked off for the weekend prior to her test date (or god forbid, the Fri before), they were completely unwilling to work with her :shakes head: It got really frustrating, and I'm glad she has moved on - everyone is happier now :tup:
LMBmikeZ
04-18-2013 11:19 AM
:hello: fellow :postwhore: hope the day is going good :tiphat:
ZMan8
04-18-2013 11:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JARblue
(Post 2272985)
I think one of the main reasons she is having better success at the exam this time around is because her stress level at work is so much lower. That and the hours are much shorter for half the year. Her former employer kept pushing for her to get her CPA license, but then when it came time to take her tests and she asked off for the weekend prior to her test date (or god forbid, the Fri before), they were completely unwilling to work with her :shakes head: It got really frustrating, and I'm glad she has moved on - everyone is happier now :tup:
:tup: same here. It was really tough to study for the exams. (though I passed all of them while working in public :p )
Stress kills job motivation so I'm glad she got to place she feels better at. :tiphat:
blackcherry20
04-18-2013 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZMan8
(Post 2272920)
:eek: wow that's nice.
45 degrees and flooded everywhere here with 2-3 more inches of rain today. :eekdance:
:eek: :icon14: :ugh2: that weather wil be HERE tomorrow...sigh. But today, I enjoy:tup:
happytheman
04-18-2013 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 2272815)
If you have any other questions, or if you want to play with mine, just let me know.
Sent from my iPizzle using magic and new-fangled science stuff
:wtf2:
( Click to show/hide )
Just kidding man, I appreciate all the help.
ZMan8
04-18-2013 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcherry20
(Post 2273060)
:eek: :icon14: :ugh2: that weather wil be HERE tomorrow...sigh. But today, I enjoy:tup:
Good luck, they actually closed I-94 completely due to flooding.... :eek:
Do you guys have a Stupid Motorists law for when people drive into flooded roads and get stuck?
ZMan8
04-18-2013 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haboob
(Post 2273092)
Wow.
Do you guys have a Stupid Motorists law for when people drive into flooded roads and get stuck?
no, it's called evolution and darwinism :stirthepot:
Haboob
04-18-2013 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZMan8
(Post 2273097)
no, it's called evolution and darwinism :stirthepot:
:icon17:
I guess it doesn't happen that often then.
We have one (Aptly called "Stupid Motorist Law" as well :D), which makes the driver responsible for all rescue costs, so that the rest of the taxpayers don't have to. :tup:
Edit: Up to $2,000 it seems, so I guess it's not super horrible, but a nice chunk of change still.
( Click to show/hide )
Quote:
28-910. Liability for emergency responses in flood areas; definitions
A. A driver of a vehicle who drives the vehicle on a public street or highway that is temporarily covered by a rise in water level, including groundwater or overflow of water, and that is barricaded because of flooding is liable for the expenses of any emergency response that is required to remove from the public street or highway the driver or any passenger in the vehicle that becomes inoperable on the public street or highway or the vehicle that becomes inoperable on the public street or highway, or both.
B. A person convicted of violating section 28-693 for driving a vehicle into any area that is temporarily covered by a rise in water level, including groundwater or overflow of water, may be liable for expenses of any emergency response that is required to remove from the area the driver or any passenger in the vehicle that becomes inoperable in the area or the vehicle that becomes inoperable in the area, or both.
C. The expenses of an emergency response are a charge against the person liable for those expenses pursuant to subsection A or B of this section. The charge constitutes a debt of that person and may be collected proportionately by the public agencies, for-profit entities or not-for-profit entities that incurred the expenses. The person's liability for the expenses of an emergency response shall not exceed two thousand dollars for a single incident. The liability imposed under this section is in addition to and not in limitation of any other liability that may be imposed.
D. An insurance policy may exclude coverage for a person's liability for expenses of an emergency response under this section.
E. For the purposes of this section:
1. "Expenses of an emergency response" means reasonable costs directly incurred by public agencies, for-profit entities or not-for-profit entities that make an appropriate emergency response to an incident.
2. "Public agency" means this state and any city, county, municipal corporation, district or other public authority that is located in whole or in part in this state and that provides police, fire fighting, medical or other emergency services.
3. "Reasonable costs" includes the costs of providing police, fire fighting, rescue and emergency medical services at the scene of an incident and the salaries of the persons who respond to the incident but does not include charges assessed by an ambulance service that is regulated pursuant to title 36, chapter 21.1, article 2.
ZMan8
04-18-2013 11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haboob
(Post 2273108)
:icon17:
I guess it doesn't happen that often then.
We have one (Aptly called "Stupid Motorist Law" as well :D), which makes the driver responsible for all rescue costs, so that the rest of the taxpayers don't have to. :tup:
I like that law
kenchan
04-18-2013 11:44 AM
wow, mr.zman-them potholes are HUGEGANGEOUS in chicago! :eek:
