Originally Posted by frost (Post 1637893)

Remember the days when you could read a news article without such blatant bias? Me neither. Anyway, I've read the bill and it's obvious they are trying to do a good thing (stop intense cyber bullying and stalking), although I don't personally care if a few wimps off themselves every year because the cool kids send them nasty messages. But, their good intentions aside, the language is just too vague and would never hold up as written. The idea that we would carted away in handcuffs for calling someone a name is about as likely as Santorum actually being able to ban pornography.

Originally Posted by TerribleONE (Post 1637544)

thanks man.. this just sounds like freedom of speech being taken away even more...

Originally Posted by b1adesofcha0s (Post 1638219)

Ghey.

Originally Posted by Huck (Post 1638226)

Suphaghey

Originally Posted by frost (Post 1637893)

Remember the days when you could read a news article without such blatant bias? Me neither. Anyway, I've read the bill and it's obvious they are trying to do a good thing (stop intense cyber bullying and stalking), although I don't personally care if a few wimps off themselves every year because the cool kids send them nasty messages. But, their good intentions aside, the language is just too vague and would never hold up as written. The idea that we would carted away in handcuffs for calling someone a name is about as likely as Santorum actually being able to ban pornography.

Originally Posted by shadoquad (Post 1638116)

I'm gonna e-stalk you, you f*ck

(no rly, internet nazis)