![]() |
Poll: Worse band, Nickelback or Puddle of Mudd?
Nickelback catches a lot of grief for being a horrible band, and rightfully so. But I think the popularity of making fun of nickelback has distracted people from puddle of mudd, and the fact they might actually be worse. Thoughts?
|
|
never bothered to listen to puddle of mudd, so i'm gonna vote nickleback as being the worst.
|
hmm thats a tough call... nickelback did do that tribute song to dimebag so there is some redeeming quality to them for that... so i guess puddle of mud out of those 2 bands
|
Funny, I was just shooting pool about an hour ago and Nickelback came on...I vote Nickelback as being worse
|
I can't vote in this poll, as both bands cause me symptoms of aneurysms.
|
Quote:
|
voted puddle of mudd because the guy's voice gets on my damn nerves
for the record, i've never seen so much scattered @$$ than i have at a nickelback concert:yum: |
|
I voted for Nickelback because they actually get a fair amount of play time on the radio.
|
What about Creed...three way tie.
|
This is a trick question.
They both sound slightly worse than your own firing squad. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Both are awful but I had to choose Nickleback. My ex loved that crap.
|
Almost a tie o_O
|
o shitt it's a tie, i voted for nickleback
|
The problem with polls is, you have to choose one. They both suck equally, so it was basically a coin flip.
|
Nickelback sucks. That's all.
|
Quote:
:icon17: |
Never heard of Puddle of Mudd, but being Canadian I have heard Nickelback. Like them or not they seem to be very successful. Is Puddle of Mudd a successful band?
|
Quote:
The only thing POM has going for them is that the first time or two you hear the song, the novelty of it makes it seem okay. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2