![]() |
Air flow test (drop-ins)
After a ton of reading all the CIA vs Drop-in threads and reading all the info on drop-ins with MAF tubes. I decided to do my own test on K&N drop-ins and Z1 MAF tubes to see if they increase air flow vs. the OEM filters and air tubes.
I bought a PLX Kiwi that I've been playing around with so I thought I would put it to good use. Using the Dash Command app I can get MAP (mass air pressure) measured in kPa and MAF (mass air flow) measured in lb/min. I started the baseline test with stock OEM filter and air intakes, took a screen shot at idle, ~4000 rpm (not moving), ~5000 rpm in 2nd gear and again ~5000 rpm in 3rd. These are my numbers, in order from top to bottom. https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2899/...97426d16_c.jpg I'll repeat the same with K&N filters installed and then again when I install the Z1 MAF tubes. |
Very interesting. Let us know the results with the drop-ins and Z1 post-MAF tubes installed. It will be interesting to compare the findings.
|
In for results....
|
Quote:
|
Nicely done, and looking forward to results.
Although, note that you may see greater differences in voltage readings under load (and certainly if moving) then just revving while stationary. |
I put in the K&N filters and ran my test.
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/06/15/e7y6ygyp.jpg I was really surprised with the numbers, so much so that I put the OEM filter back in and ran the test again. http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/06/15/y8unagug.jpg Kinda confirmed the K&N numbers. I think this needs more testing and another person to take the screen shots (so I'm not doing it while driving) to try to be a little more accurate. I think I also want some cruising numbers at about 80mph in 6th. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I've got dash command and JWT CAI (short tubes). I'll run the test tonight on the way home for some comparison numbers.
Be advised I'm in denver so air is thin... |
Hmmm … even more interesting. Keep us posted. It would be interesting to see the results with the Z1 silicone tubes installed, regardless of the filter type.
|
Doing it on the same road and stretch? Engine load plays into this. 5k up a hill has huge numbers vs 5k going down a hill. You need 100% same conditions too. A gust of wind increase load on the car. This isn't a great test. You need to bench flow test the whole intake plan and simple.
|
Quote:
Your exactly right, and I'm trying to the same each time, yet it's far from perfect. Just having some fun playing more than anything. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Yes not very scientific as I will not be putting stock stuff back in for comparison but I'll throw up some numbers anyhow just for fun.
|
I would try and do a sweep on a dyno to keep things close and under constant load -- heated IAT's will play a role as well as load, and should be recorded too.
|
Intake temps so far have been pretty consistent, between 100-110. I let the cold start warm up to 100 before starting the test.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
This is cool! I'd like to see the difference between stock,post mafs with drop ins, short ram and cold air setups as well.
|
Okay...I admit, I don't know what these numbers mean. Bottom line, the drop in better than OEM?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2