![]() |
|
Quote:
Yeah, I figured the restriction would only kill power... our meters aren't hotwires? If they are, flow rmass is based on flow rate over the wire, which is very much affected by diameter, although the section before the MAF wouldn't have changed, so voltage readings should still reflect OEM scaling. Of course, abrupt transitions can throw things off... a problem I sort of hoped would not come up, but who knows until I try. Anywho... I ordered a different set which should definitely have a smooth transition from bellmouth to the OEM diameter, so we'll see how that goes. Quote:
On that note, I have some fiberglass repair kits I should just probably sell off... |
Quote:
As long as you don't change the duct size at the sensor (plus a diameter or two up- and down-stream) the sensor output should remain the same. |
At long last, the new velocity stacks have arrived!
http://www.the370z.com/members/jordo...40625-0001.jpg These have the right dimensions, so next step is to see what I need to do to fit them, in keeping with my plan to use the OEM airbox. More details coming soon! |
Test fit -- so far so good.
http://www.the370z.com/members/jordo...40625-0003.jpg http://www.the370z.com/members/jordo...40625-0004.jpg I might be able to just "snap" them in with some careful dremeling of the inside of the intake neck. If not, I'll have to make a bracket of some sort. http://www.the370z.com/members/jordo...40625-0007.jpg However, I'll have to have the filter sit forward a bit -- fits fine, so shouldn't be an issue; might make something to ensure it stays flush -- and figure out something for the top. More soon... |
After some additional thinking on this, I think my plan will be to bore out the inside of the OEM intake neck enough to have the v-stacks slide/snap in. Then I need to maybe drill in two flat head screws to secure it, or perhaps a thin layer of jbweld to keep it in place.
For the filter's slight relocation, all I should need are two thin strips of metal, similar to battery ties to ensure it doesn't pop out of position. Based on how snugly it fits, it should require much to secure it. The top can simply be the OEM one, with the "frame" modified or removed so it just covers the opening. I might even simply bolt it to the front section to ensure that the OEM lid clamps will still keep it all together. Essentially, the rear section would go in separately, then the modified front section plus filter would be locked down and sealed to the rear section. That should actually work, and make changing filters only moderately more challenging that it would have been on a totally OEM airbox. So... question: What sort of hole saw like tool/accessory do I need to shave the inside of the neck precisely? Also, is there something I could use that would create a slight tapering as I get to the desired depth to snap in the v-stack, and help ensure a smooth transition from V-stack to OEM intake neck? Would I be better off taking this to a machine shop or something??? Looks like I need a tapered shell reamer -- something like this http://canadatool.ca/php/images/stor...rs%20taper.jpg ? Anybody have any advice/relevant experience on this one? |
While I applaud your efforts and don't want to discourage you, I don't think that setup is going to do any good and may decrease performance. You are increasing the length of the "restricted" section between the box and MAF and the air to the right of the stack in the last pic will have to make a turn. You may also be affecting the tuning of the intake/manifold.
|
Quote:
I'm hoping if I can ream out the intake neck enough, I can recess the v-stack further into it, which will minimize the degree its even an issue. |
The stacks shown in the second pic of the OP look like they might do some good. What you show in your last sets of pics looks like it would interfere with the flow. But I'm not an Aerodynamics Engineer (or Engineer of any sort). I'm looking forward to seeing your results and hope that my guesses are wrong.
A big dowel pin reamer may give you the taper you are looking for but not sure how it would work on plastic. |
Quote:
I'm hoping to recess the thing in by a few inches so it will be less of an issue. That might even give me enough room to just keep the OEM filter location, instead of having it sit a bit farther forward. On that note, I'm not sure if filter position will make a difference either... I'm committed to this experiment now, so win lose or draw, it will give me some useful info on what to do next (e.g., have even shorter v-stacks made) or whether to abandon the project entirely... BTW, thanks for all of your input -- I very much appreciate it :tiphat: |
The portion of the airflow that is to the right of the stack in your pics doesn't look like it will have a straight shot to the stack unless the stack is a lot shorter. Can you cut the stack to make it shorter? That would avoid a lot of "machine" work on the plastic parts.
I don't think the position of the filter will have much effect on flow but it certainly would be a lot easier to R&R if it were in the original position. Hang in there! This is one of the few time I'm hoping someone proves me wrong. :) |
Minor update: After having NO luck finding a drill attachment that could smoothly bore the inside of the airbox intake tube to 2.625" (i.e., 2 5/8"), I attempted to bore it out manually with my dremmel...
Ehhhh... the short version is that it's too sloppy and needs more honing and, even worse, I cracked the outside of the tube trying to wedge my v-stacks in. D'OH! So I am now considering a different route. If I just cut out the outer intake tube and cram the v-stack inside the hole, I can then simply use coupler to connect the intake tube to the v-stack, with the end of the v-stack poking through the hole in the airbox. So long as I cut it right, it should be airtight (or easily fixed to make it so), connect perfectly to the OEM intake tube, take advantage of the OEM heat shielding as planned, and work almost identically to how I had originally envisioned the final version. Moreover, it will allow me to recess the bellmouth further back, which may allow me to use OEM panel filter frame or at least minimize the likelihood of inadvertently losing part of the effective volume of the box because the v-stack protrudes too far. More on this soon -- I may need a fresh set of airboxes... anyone willing to sell them to me on the cheap in the name of experimentation and adventure? :D |
Quote:
I will post pics when I get back, and in due course, dyno test -- but this will all have to wait until at least the end of July. More details coming soon :tup: |
Update: I am within days of bolting everything together and within a week of doing testing.
Tons of pics and dynos coming very soon -- finally! (or a sad report of failure devoid of worthless pics... hoping on the former, obviously.) It will have the V-stacks recessed in box, coupled to OEM MAF holder and neck, make use of a modified OEM filter bracket and lid, and should all snap in and bolt down just like OEM, but with a nice V-stack, exactly as planned. We'll see... report on success or failure soon... to be continued.... |
Good luck. I've got my fingers crossed.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2