Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   Custom ported and CNC throttle bodies, upper and lower manifolds by Synergy Composite (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/86210-custom-ported-cnc-throttle-bodies-upper-lower-manifolds-synergy-composite.html)

synolimit 09-16-2014 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m3chhawk (Post 2966896)
Post the UpRev fuel tables.


Send me a cable

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bananaz (Post 2966900)
So dyno is saying you gained absolutely nothing? That's hard to believe.

I know. I can only blame the dyno. I can't see anything else at this point. Or maybe gearing.

Bananaz 09-16-2014 04:47 PM

Do you have stock gears? And did you have stoxk gears last dyno? And isn't our closest 1:1 ratio in 5th?

synolimit 09-16-2014 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bananaz (Post 2967044)
Do you have stock gears? And did you have stoxk gears last dyno? And isn't our closest 1:1 ratio in 5th?

Yes. Yes. Yes.

I meant gearing as in did both dyno operators use 4th. I'm like 99% sure but still.

Megan370z 09-16-2014 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bananaz (Post 2967044)
Do you have stock gears? And did you have stoxk gears last dyno? And isn't our closest 1:1 ratio in 5th?

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2967120)
Yes. Yes. Yes.

I meant gearing as in did both dyno operators use 4th. I'm like 99% sure but still.


Bananaz has a point there but Synolimit if you are certain both operator did it in 4th , great.

I just want to point out what could happen with a couple example on a Hub dyno and dynojet from my last dyno test day with the VHR engine in 2011.


Hub dyno ;
1 pull in each 4th & 5th gear with the same FD ratio.

http://www.the370z.com/members/megan...ure43795-a.jpg


and on a dynojet ;

5th gear = 320 whp *average*
http://www.the370z.com/members/megan...ure43796-a.jpg

4th gear = 311 whp *aveage*
http://www.the370z.com/members/megan...ure43797-a.jpg

synolimit 09-16-2014 08:31 PM

Damn. So even if it was the wrong gear it's only 9hp. Still missing some. Going to drive me crazy.

Kingbaby 09-16-2014 08:39 PM

It's always the tune! To say NA is not worth it makes me chuckle, not that it's false. We been bambooselased into this mindset that NA is a waste! It's poor tuning...basic fuel table correction is what most tuners do and rarely do it right!

More air, more power

Tune for that and power will be made, I've played with UpRev for a few weeks before being deployed and after looking at my tune, which is doing it's best is holding by car back. Dyno time and tuning cost keeps NA builds from really shining!

To cap my rant, building a NA Z is for the insane and I love it!

Kingbaby 09-16-2014 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2967277)
Damn. So even if it was the wrong gear it's only 9hp. Still missing some. Going to drive me crazy.

It is if your only looking at peak power, I want to say that your mid range Has gone up more than 9whp.

I've spent 3-4k myself on NA mods and my peak power was 284whp!?!

I wanted to light my car on fire after that....

Seen others post higher numbers on the same dyno, I added more air and I pull on all these cars harder to redline, haven't retuned yet!?!

synolimit 09-16-2014 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kingbaby (Post 2967285)
It is if your only looking at peak power, I want to say that your mid range Has gone up more than 9whp.

I've spent 3-4k myself on NA mods and my peak power was 284whp!?!

I wanted to light my car on fire after that....

Seen others post higher numbers on the same dyno, I added more air and I pull on all these cars harder to redline, haven't retuned yet!?!

But it hasn't. The red line even dips below the blue a few times. That mess up at 5500 rpm for 700 rpm (5300-6000) I don't think counts.










New game plan. Found a local with some parts and a uprev tune. We are both going to IPS to log our cars fuel, timing, MAF etc and doing 3 pulls each. Theoretically I should make more than he. But his tune done at IPS several months ago is higher than me. So if IPS did recal the dyno we'll know for sure whats going on!

G37Some 09-16-2014 10:55 PM

I never said NA isnt worth it. I just said the only real bang for your buck is FI.
you gain more HP/TQ per dollar going FI than if you stay NA. its a fact.

I know u disagreed with me, saying my statement wasnt fair, and the test car is having problems - but dyno'ing a year apart is a problem within itself. if it was any manufacturer saying their product did XXXXX on this dyno and then a year later the results were XXX, everyone would jump on them. if you know the car has problems - that is your solution to this dilemma right off the bat...

All i meant is that I wish you had better results, but allowing the car to breath better via ported throttle bodies, upper intake manifold and intakes/exhaust seems comparable across the board, per your results vs. everyone elses results with basic bolt ons, whether you get it done custom or buy another product already on the market. without FI the car, the car is already performing like a champ so the breather mods arent game changers without FI.

props to all your effort, i just meant i wish you had better results for everything that went into it.

synolimit 09-16-2014 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G37Some (Post 2967352)
I never said NA isnt worth it. I just said the only real bang for your buck is FI.
you gain more HP/TQ per dollar going FI than if you stay NA. its a fact.

I know u disagreed with me, saying my statement wasnt fair, and the test car is having problems - but dyno'ing a year apart is a problem within itself. if it was any manufacturer saying their product did XXXXX on this dyno and then a year later the results were XXX, everyone would jump on them. if you know the car has problems - that is your solution to this dilemma right off the bat...

All i meant is that I wish you had better results, but allowing the car to breath better via ported throttle bodies, upper intake manifold and intakes/exhaust seems comparable across the board, per your results vs. everyone elses results with basic bolt ons, whether you get it done custom or buy another product already on the market. without FI the car, the car is already performing like a champ so the breather mods arent game changers without FI.

props to all your effort, i just meant i wish you had better results for everything that went into it.

Good thing I built it all my own. I have less in everything than most spend on a CBE. :happydance: I don't know about that though. Whats FI get the average person? I've seen people talk about $15k to do it right!! If I truly gained only 30hp from stock then I have $73 per HP (I really doubt it. Should be like 60hp so $36 per). If a FI gets say 500HP and a max NA can only get 300HP and if FI costs $15k then FI is $75 per HP over NA. But in my case we are talking $12,800 difference.


I don't know the car has problems. Everything I see seems fine. I ported some stuff, I made a little bigger CAI, I tuned. The issue shouldn't be on my end. If it is we'll fix soon. Only testing further will I find out. If IPS changed the dyno then I'll prove my ported parts work by installing them on another car and doing befores and afters the same day to show it. Sucks to do it this way but o well.

I bought my Z to track. I was tired of tuning my WRX and dealing with turbos and pipe and BOV's etc etc. I'd rather drive a 300HP NA all day than a 500HP turbo. Hell I can't even touch the throttle now around a corner, a turbo would kill me. Turboing a Z reminds me racing my super sport ZX6R. My little 600 can kill 1000's because most can't run them to their full potential. NA FTW haha. Give me Shamu's 400HP NA Z. I'll rock that.

Bananaz 09-16-2014 11:21 PM

Regardless, props to you for trying to find ways to make more power out of this stubborn motor! I'm sure there is a problem somewhere.

synolimit 09-17-2014 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bananaz (Post 2967370)
Regardless, props to you for trying to find ways to make more power out of this stubborn motor! I'm sure there is a problem somewhere.

My friend with a uprev tune and I will dyno together soon with logs. I'll figure it out. He believes IPS did a recal on the DJ. He was 316hp several months ago. Fingers crossed he's down too since he shouldn't be making more. I guess stand by.

G37Some 09-18-2014 06:40 PM

i'm not here to argue with you syno, some single turbo builds are putting out 200+whp gains for 9k installed, brand new. ~45$/whp - even less if you buy a used kit.... stillen intakes, fast intentions hfc/cbe, uprev tune = up to 50whp gains and cost ~$2900 (+install if needed). ~58$/whp. The fact that you are doing more than these mods for less $$$ is great, dont get me wrong. my car is full na too, i don't have the 9k to shell out - but just saying.

knowledge is power. keep testing, providing knowledge and paving the way for others to reference! I legit wanted to do the porting of upper intake manifold and TB's if this had good results. Side by side dyno run with your friend is an awesome idea and will be an awesome reference if you list his exact mods in comparison to yours.

synolimit 09-19-2014 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G37Some (Post 2970438)
i'm not here to argue with you syno, some single turbo builds are putting out 200+whp gains for 9k installed, brand new. ~45$/whp - even less if you buy a used kit.... stillen intakes, fast intentions hfc/cbe, uprev tune = up to 50whp gains and cost ~$2900 (+install if needed). ~58$/whp. The fact that you are doing more than these mods for less $$$ is great, dont get me wrong. my car is full na too, i don't have the 9k to shell out - but just saying.

knowledge is power. keep testing, providing knowledge and paving the way for others to reference! I legit wanted to do the porting of upper intake manifold and TB's if this had good results. Side by side dyno run with your friend is an awesome idea and will be an awesome reference if you list his exact mods in comparison to yours.

I'm not arguing either. I just know its the dyno. Megan got 68hp NA. That puts me at $32 :). So I win haha. I don't have it either and never would! That's just insane. I'd build my own like I have before. Way I see turbo kits is a few grand for turbos and parts then you end up paying several thousand for the pipe. Just a rip.

I'll keep on it. It can't not show results. Increase air, increase power. Simple as that.

Megan370z 09-19-2014 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2971106)
I'm not arguing either. I just know its the dyno. Megan got 68hp NA. That puts me at $32 :). So I win haha. I don't have it either and never would! That's just insane. I'd build my own like I have before. Way I see turbo kits is a few grand for turbos and parts then you end up paying several thousand for the pipe. Just a rip.

I'll keep on it. It can't not show results. Increase air, increase power. Simple as that.

well that 68whp as cost me a lot !
if you take in consideration the amount of time involved in what work and what didn't and redo the test later on to confirm .. it was an expensive one.

I had an edge in the beginning until I blew the engine now that 60+whp is common using normal pump gas and using the right bolt-on available parts.

with all the side cost involve in each mod, the price can get high
so far my estimate is like this
custom CAI 1500$
Oversized TB 625 $
HR intake manifold ( 150$ ) (not good for peak HP )
crank pulley 250$
custom PPE lth 1500$
x-pipe and muffler 1500$
Uprev software 700$

total 6225 for 68whp in the end which mean 1 hp / 92.54$
I could have used cheaper part to make the setup drop 1000$ from the total can bring the Hp/$ ratio down to 76.84$/hp

it could have been cheaper if I was in the US but the shipping cost is a lot thru the border.

that 68whp isn't the minimum that platform can gain and as I said , I believe seeing another 20whp is quite possible still using pump gas 91/93.
I didn't had the VHR intake manifold ported like Z1 started to do after I did showed how badly the intake runner were matching up.

m3chhawk 09-19-2014 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2971106)
Way I see turbo kits is a few grand for turbos and parts then you end up paying several thousand for the pipe. Just a rip.

Not completely true.. If you add up everything other than the piping, manifolds, oil lines, vbands, hoses, etc. for the Boosted Performance kit, you are still over $5k. Sasha sells the full kit, ready to run without so much as going to the auto parts store for thread sealant for $7,150 and its capable of a safe 550 HP. Throw in $750 for a tune and you are still less than $30/HP

Bananaz 09-19-2014 11:26 AM

It's definitely easier to boost for power but I like how people are trying to make power NA

m3chhawk 09-19-2014 11:46 AM

For sure. I would love this car in a 450 HP NA build.

indyn 09-19-2014 03:27 PM

OP, you did an amazing job in all the mods you got. I'm sure something is amiss somewhere in the dyno runs. Any chance you can hit the drag strip and measure out your 1/4 mile runs, atleast they will give out power measurements in an another way.


P.S. There's different kind of fun with NA motor, its less headaches and less OVERALL investment. One thing FI options seem to neglect are the ongoing and increased maintenance, more chances of something going wrong.

synolimit 09-19-2014 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by indyn (Post 2971880)
OP, you did an amazing job in all the mods you got. I'm sure something is amiss somewhere in the dyno runs. Any chance you can hit the drag strip and measure out your 1/4 mile runs, atleast they will give out power measurements in an another way.


P.S. There's different kind of fun with NA motor, its less headaches and less OVERALL investment. One thing FI options seem to neglect are the ongoing and increased maintenance, more chances of something going wrong.

I don't see why not. I'll have to go get weighed and run next week.

Glover997 09-26-2014 06:57 PM

any update on this ?!

synolimit 09-26-2014 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glover997 (Post 2980059)
any update on this ?!

yes and no.

still waiting on dyno and to view someone elses results there to see if im at fault or the dyno and i did go to the strip the other night.

turns out it was to cold, poor car, tires, or TO MUCH POWER.

last time i went to the strip i only had a CBE and the old CAI. i still had my RPF1's but i had hocky puck HTR Z3's, and a little trunk gutting at stock ride height.

now im lighter, should have more power, 2" lower, front aero with canards and splitter, RS-3 tires that should be way stickier etc.

i had zero traction in 1st, 2nd and chirped 3rd. i got 3 runs in and it went from 70's down into the 40's. my fastest MPH before was 106.5 and now its only 105.5. so again im down on power, my aero is slowing me down, it was so cold i just couldnt get up to speed in 1-2-3 or something else!!

lol who knows!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SlowZ 09-26-2014 08:54 PM

RS3s are terrible drag tires lol. I roast my 305/30 wayyyy to easily. Even if I light them up before a launch I'll still spin 1st and most of second

synolimit 09-26-2014 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlowZ (Post 2980146)
RS3s are terrible drag tires lol. I roast my 305/30 wayyyy to easily. Even if I light them up before a launch I'll still spin 1st and most of second

Hmm so tires get 2 votes now. O well at this point. Just need get other testing done.

SlowZ 09-27-2014 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2980206)
Hmm so tires get 2 votes now. O well at this point. Just need get other testing done.

Yeah if you say it was cold out too RS3s hate the cold. Just sounds like a bad day to be at the track. Things just aren't going your way

synolimit 09-27-2014 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlowZ (Post 2980584)
Yeah if you say it was cold out too RS3s hate the cold. Just sounds like a bad day to be at the track. Things just aren't going your way

Well first run was 70's but I still peeled 1st and slid sideways in 2nd so maybe next year.

synolimit 10-05-2014 03:41 PM

http://www.the370z.com/track-autocro...ml#post2642799


So my dyno and 1/4 mile all suck but at least I have some power to prove from all this!! This tells me my dyno reads low and my tires suck for the strip. I'm getting 6.5 seconds on the vid and that's with my tires chirping in 2nd. I figure that's a good tenth or two right there if i can get them hotter. This is ZL1 and C63 AMG territory so woohoo for only 302rwhp.

synolimit, 2013, Nissan, 370z, 3200*, 3.7, 6 Cyl, All Motor, NA, 93, 302, 244, 14.0, 105.5, 6.5

http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=y...&v=gDcVViN-n-E

V8Killer 10-06-2014 06:20 AM

So will you be going back to the dyno anytime soon?

megalapagas 10-06-2014 06:30 AM

That looks pretty peppy man I think your more than just 302whp man since it only takes you about 6 seconds from 50-100, I just went back on a video of mine and it take me 9 seconds from 50-100 so Thatsa Big Difference. (Mind You, I'm not tuned and just have exhaust)

ANMVQ 10-06-2014 07:12 AM

What gear are you using to measure the 50-100 MPH run.

Masterbeatty 10-06-2014 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANMVQ (Post 2989989)
What gear are you using to measure the 50-100 MPH run.

phone video recorder/ gopro facing spedometer and tachometer. :tup:

FPenvy 10-06-2014 08:24 AM

thought for a 50-100 run everyone was hovering at 50 THEN gas. if i went balls out to 50and started a run then i'd be at 100 in about 4 seconds or so lol

looks like maybe i'll finally have someone ride along and film mine.

ANMVQ 10-06-2014 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Masterbeatty (Post 2990056)
phone video recorder/ gopro facing spedometer and tachometer. :tup:

Opps did I not write "gear" what gear LOL

synolimit 10-06-2014 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V8Killer (Post 2989958)
So will you be going back to the dyno anytime soon?

Don't see why now. It reads to low, I know the tunes safe and the cars fast so...

synolimit 10-06-2014 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by megalapagas (Post 2989961)
That looks pretty peppy man I think your more than just 302whp man since it only takes you about 6 seconds from 50-100, I just went back on a video of mine and it take me 9 seconds from 50-100 so Thatsa Big Difference. (Mind You, I'm not tuned and just have exhaust)

Thanks and yes I agree. Mathematically I figure with HP to weight ratio I should be 20% less than you if you're stock weight and all. So 6.5 vs 8-9 should be around 20% also and would make sense.

synolimit 10-06-2014 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANMVQ (Post 2990066)
Opps did I not write "gear" what gear LOL

2nd and redline 3rd.

synolimit 10-06-2014 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 2990064)
thought for a 50-100 run everyone was hovering at 50 THEN gas. if i went balls out to 50and started a run then i'd be at 100 in about 4 seconds or so lol

looks like maybe i'll finally have someone ride along and film mine.

As stated very clearly in the instructions you do it any way possible to get the fastest time. Every single car I showed both stock and modified were done my way or 1/4 mile times. That means balls to the wall blowing by 50. All 4 times we have on this page are also clearly done this way in the videos they posted. I believe though Megan is so slow because he rounded that corner in 3rd and clearly 2nd to 3rd is the fastest and on these cars you have to have rise the rev limiter like I have so you don't switch into 4th.

FPenvy 10-07-2014 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2990849)
As stated very clearly in the instructions you do it any way possible to get the fastest time. Every single car I showed both stock and modified were done my way or 1/4 mile times. That means balls to the wall blowing by 50. All 4 times we have on this page are also clearly done this way in the videos they posted. I believe though Megan is so slow because he rounded that corner in 3rd and clearly 2nd to 3rd is the fastest and on these cars you have to have rise the rev limiter like I have so you don't switch into 4th.

well my 1/4 is 12.89 @ 111mph i think my 50-100 will be pretty good then lol

pretty sure i can pull 50-100 in 4-5 seconds honestly. i'll have to test this theroy this weekend since it's rain for the next few days it seems.

ANMVQ 10-07-2014 07:40 AM

OK cause everyone skip me LOL I'm guessing the 50-100 run is in 5th? I wanna test this also. :/

synolimit 10-07-2014 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 2991580)
well my 1/4 is 12.89 @ 111mph i think my 50-100 will be pretty good then lol

pretty sure i can pull 50-100 in 4-5 seconds honestly. i'll have to test this theroy this weekend since it's rain for the next few days it seems.

What do you have done? Cause those are turbo times as shown by phunk and firehawk.

http://www.the370z.com/track-autocro...ml#post2642799


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2