![]() |
Test Pipe or HFC?
I'm on the Fence with going HFC or TP and after weeks of searching can't find any good posts :shakes head: on One versus the other for A:Performance B:CEL lights
:icon18: |
i'm with you trying to determine what to go with. but the more research i do the more confused i get. i just don't to put money into something and it sound like a ricer no harm meant to anyone just feel that way..... or maybe i should have said a honda with a tin can stuck on it
|
test pipes
pros: best flowing, no restrictions what so ever, yummy gas smell? cons: WAY louder in comparison to hfc, both rasp, drone, exhaust note, a good alternative to this are the ART pipes, which have a separate resonance chamber. some are made with the j-tube style o2 bung to trick the o2 sensor for no CEL, some don't. Smell (some hate it, some actually love it) high flow cats pros: no smell, theoretically shouldn't trip the o2 sensor, should flow similar to the test pipe, but obviously not as much cons: more expensive, cores can possibly break or come loose, especially if you track your car, the excessive high temp exhaust gas will have an effect on the core |
I have hfc's and will be switching to test pipes. They are cheaper, safer and provide more gains. Should have just gone with them from the start.
I wouldn't say our engine sounds very honda ricey with test pipes, it's a much bigger engine than you might see on those hondas with pop can exhaust. |
|
ART Pipes FTW!
|
Resonated TPs or punched cats, when through it all on my 350z, non res,res,high flow,and last, punched cats, this is my number one option, looks like cats, and flows better, just add some defoulers to the sensors. I bought a set of used cats for 50 bucks and went to town, some scrap yards will even buy the platinum out of the cats.
|
From what I have read unless you have FI I would suggest Resonated TPs .. Also on a NA car they seem to make a bit more power because your not losing backpressure.. FI engine's need no backpressure...
|
Good post man.. I'm in the same boat..
|
Thank you everyone for your replies...
Was hoping someone here with TP on a Z would chime in if they have a CEL issue?:confused: I'm still as unsure as before :wtf2: To pay double for the HFC and still no guarantee of CEL :confused: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
CEL was my biggest concern, disabling via uprev is a workaround not a solution. Went with ART pipes, v3, new factory gasket design. No leaks, quality product and most of all no CEL. Expensive...yes...but worth every penny to get get what you pay for. Getting a cheaper product in the beginning will only cost more in the end.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Disabling the DTC in the uprev tune doesn't disable the sensor it just stops it from throwing the code when it detects abnormal parameters.. IE too much exhaust flow. |
Ok, i think i have decided to go test pipes, seems most natural imo, a straight pipe, no bs!
|
I have HFCs, mainly because my buddy with a 350Z had test pipes and I felt like I was getting high on fumes when I drove his car. My other reason is that, last time I took my 350Z in for emissions, they did the sniffer test (I live in Washington State). Anybody successfully passed a sniffer test with test pipes on a VQ engine? Is it even possible?
|
I'm in Florida, no sniff tests, but I'm counting on the Smell being sweet aroma as I'm mashing the throttle!
|
Btw, swinging through a new Tuner shop in Oldsmar to check out the turn around time on the
|
I've got the Stillen HFC's and im throwin a CEL light. Clears itself away randomly but comes back eventually. Going to try to get o2 bung extenders to see if i can stop it from throwing the CEL so I'll chime back in later. Anyone know the thread on the o2 sensors? 18X1.5mm i assume? that way i can i get the correct size.
|
Well, work kept me from getting to the shop so hoping I can get some mods before the Nopi run so i'm not feeling so Stock and caught with my pants :icon23:
|
I know this is an older thread, but seems like some disinformation.
1) CEL thrown due to a change in CAT will be because the ECU has found the amount of pollutants is out of param and cannot correct the A/F ratio enough to bring it back in line. The easiest solution and recommended is to tune the vehicle. Simply deleting the sensor will likely leave the ECU in the last known state of the A/F ratio. 2) Test pipes will throw a CEL on a stock ECU. Your choice is to live with it, periodically reset it or delete the sensor through a program like Uprev. 3) HFC due to their construction will be more expensive and theoretically will pass emissions testing and not throw a CEL. In practice YMMV. 4) Free flowing exhaust will produce more HP on the top and mid range. Some engines may see a decrease in low end torque. IMO I would rather have the free flowing exhaust and take the increase in HP. 5) Changes in the exhaust system will result in sound changes. Some good, some bad depending upon your taste. Personally I can live with a little more sound outside the vehicle, but would not want increase in drone. Would also want to carry on a normal conversation inside the vehicle. My goal is increased HP with moderate increase in sound. |
I always wondered where tuners take the AFRs readings from, a sniffer on the tail pipe or from the O2 sensors on the vehicle.
I'd imagine that if you had a j-shaped O2 bung it would read slightly leaner than if the bung where right inside the test pipe. Therefore you would tune with a bit more richer AFR to offset that. I'm pretty sure people using J-shaped O2 bungs on there test pipes are leaving power on the table because the O2 sensor is getting an in accurate AFR. Correct me if I am wrong here. |
Quote:
|
whats the best test pipe to get? when i was getting my intake installed, a guy was on the dyno and they were saying cause that art test pipes were restricting the flow and he wasn't getting as much hp as he should.
|
Quote:
|
I loved my MXP test pipe and didn't throw a check engine light.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2