Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   CAI: Modshack Experimental.....> (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/5709-cai-modshack-experimental.html)

Modshack 06-18-2009 04:58 PM

CAI: Modshack Experimental.....>
 
Stage one is in. Stage 2 will be to add larger MAF tubes, Smooth silicone hose, and fresh air feeds from the Fang vents. So far so good. Sounds great with the Stillen Cat back and feels strong. More as I add parts to the mix...

http://images30.fotki.com/v480/photo...MG_1826-vi.jpg

http://images20.fotki.com/v357/photo...MG_1825-vi.jpg

http://images49.fotki.com/v1503/phot...MG_1767-vi.jpg

Enhance ID MAF tubes..
http://images46.fotki.com/v1517/phot...MG_1792-vi.jpg

Smooth 2.75" (up from 2.5) Silicone:
http://images50.fotki.com/v1526/phot...MG_1818-vi.jpg

ZforMe 06-18-2009 05:58 PM

Would this "Stage 1" just be considered more free flowing than stock. As I've seen you mention before, the stock setup does a decent job at pulling cool air in (outside of engine bay).

Modshack 06-18-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZforMe (Post 94223)
Would this "Stage 1" just be considered more free flowing than stock. As I've seen you mention before, the stock setup does a decent job at pulling cool air in (outside of engine bay).

At this atage, yes....I'll be running front feeds from the fang vents to the thru ports for some forced fresh air. No one else has done this yet and it should result in reduced IAT's and consequently some performance gains.

http://images31.fotki.com/v1039/phot...MG_1810-vi.jpg

http://images49.fotki.com/v1521/phot...MG_1789-vi.jpg

kdo2milger 06-18-2009 06:11 PM

looks good sofar...

will you be doing a solid red version?

semtex 06-18-2009 06:25 PM

Lookin' good! I bet you'd benefit from getting rid of those 'accordion' sections and replacing them with some smooth tubing too. Oh wait, that's part of stage 2, isn't it? Never mind.

G37Sam 06-18-2009 06:38 PM

Subscribing, do you plan on doing before & after dyno's?

dad 06-18-2009 07:16 PM

Did you get a patent on that?

Endgame 06-18-2009 08:03 PM

Will those work with the Nismo CAI???

Mike 06-18-2009 10:05 PM

Looks great Steve! What color did you use for the match?

Modshack 06-18-2009 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike (Post 94403)
Looks great Steve! What color did you use for the match?

LOL...I'm embarassed to say I don't know Milke! It's some powder I got off Ebay years ago when I was just starting out with the PC stuff. It's close to a Ford blue.....

Mike 06-18-2009 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Modshack (Post 94411)
LOL...I'm embarassed to say I don't know Milke! It's some powder I got off Ebay years ago when I was just starting out with the PC stuff. It's close to a Ford blue.....

Well, in the pictures at least, it looks perfect! Nice job!

FuszNissan 06-19-2009 08:37 AM

Looking good Steve!

shabarivas 06-19-2009 10:16 AM

woah before and after dyno pleaseee

Modshack 06-19-2009 04:40 PM

Step one of stage 2: Smooth pipes. 2.75" smooth silicone and custom aluminum couplers for the EGR connections. Just done, drive impressions later!

http://images50.fotki.com/v1526/phot...MG_1835-vi.jpg

http://images49.fotki.com/v1502/phot...MG_1832-vi.jpg

EGR connections:
http://images49.fotki.com/v1509/phot...MG_1833-vi.jpg

The old stuff:
http://images30.fotki.com/v1038/phot...MG_1838-vi.jpg

The accordion is more restrictive than I imagined:
http://images50.fotki.com/v1526/phot...MG_1839-vi.jpg

More pics at my link below in the CAI album

AB370Z 06-19-2009 06:17 PM

Great looking design. I look forward to your driving impressions.

I assume the removal of the engine cross brace was a temporary thing only for this install?

Modshack 06-19-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AB370Z (Post 95051)
Great looking design. I look forward to your driving impressions.

I assume the removal of the engine cross brace was a temporary thing only for this install?

Thanks! Brace back on and here are the impressions:

I have to say, the difference with the new hose was dramatic. Moreso than the change after adding just the filters. Response, tip in power, torque, and sound all changed noticeably. Honestly it surprised me and I have a pretty well calibrated Butt. This leads me back to my feeling that the stock boxes are not the weakest link. What is, is the accordion hose and 2.5"ID path. Opening this to 2.75 is a 21% increase in surface area, Volume is increased, flow is smoothed.. There is still a restriction at the stock MAF holders which leads me to believe the additional plenum area the 2.75 provides is significant. Interesting that Nismo has chosen 2.75" tubes for their system. Fuel trims are still in line. I have a feeling there's even more power on the table with the enhanced MAf TUBES. More when I get these done!

kdo2milger 06-20-2009 11:08 AM

Keep the test coming Steve...

I like the idea of using a set up like this rather than the gen 3, not saying theres anything wrong with the gen 3, because that was originally on my mods list. I have since changed my mind simply for the installation of it. I just do not want to remove the front facia at all!

I also like that it looks as if we may be able to get colored 2.75" tubing and filter housings too...

Modshack 06-20-2009 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kdo2milger (Post 95401)
Keep the test coming Steve...

I like the idea of using a set up like this rather than the gen 3, not saying theres anything wrong with the gen 3, because that was originally on my mods list. I have since changed my mind simply for the installation of it. I just do not want to remove the front facia at all!

I also like that it looks as if we may be able to get colored 2.75" tubing and filter housings too...

Keep in mind this is a DIY with no intent of offering for commercial sale. I do build CAI's for another brand but those are well established and much simpler. This is just my personal project. Honestly, given the man hours invested, component costs, and fabrication needed to install as you see it, it could not be offered for a reasonable "bolt in" price...You have to "Macgyver" quite a few things which is generally not commercially acceptable. I fabricate on the fly so even duplicating this would be a chore.

Final fit with MAF tubes installed:
http://images49.fotki.com/v1500/phot...MG_1849-vi.jpg

FuszNissan 06-20-2009 11:54 AM

Guess you can put the gen 3 back on the list...lol

RCZ 06-20-2009 02:06 PM

Looks great, however I have my reservations about using silicone hoses in intakes. I'm sure it works great, but I remember a while back people were having big issues with silicone tubes collapsing. They have great strength holding pressure, but when you create negative pressure, they dont have the structural rigidity to hold their shape. If you have changing diameters in the piping, that will throw off the MAF readings as the air volume changes...I know its not FI, but still. What are your thoughts about that?

Modshack 06-20-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 95484)
Looks great, however I have my reservations about using silicone hoses in intakes. I'm sure it works great, but I remember a while back people were having big issues with silicone tubes collapsing. They have great strength holding pressure, but when you create negative pressure, they dont have the structural rigidity to hold their shape. If you have changing diameters in the piping, that will throw off the MAF readings as the air volume changes...I know its not FI, but still. What are your thoughts about that?

RCZ....There is really not much suction generated. Restriction through a free flow or even a stock box is pretty minimal.. I've measured it on other cars with a Magnehelic gauge. We were always upgrading the rubber intake pipe on the turbo'd Audi's to silicone and never had an issue and they suck a LOT of air.. This silicone has pretty good rigidity. Stick a sock in your filter and you may have an problem....;)

On the MAF: The diameter of the tubing at the MAF determines the velocity of the Air flow over the MAF. The MAF controls the fuel signal with the 02 sensor sending corrective info to the ECU. Since The stock Z runs rich, I am constantly seeing a -9 to 10% correction on the long term (Partial throttle) fuel trims. You can open up that tube "slightly", drop the velocity therefore reducing the MAF signal while upping the volume, and therefore bring the fuel trims closer to 0% where the car will make more power. It's a balancing act to do it right. Trust me, I've done a LOT of experimenting on this with the Audi's and have Hundreds of thousands of test miles on the Tubes I build for them. . Very careful tuning of the pipe diameter can result in real gains as long as you don't go to the extreme of needing to alter the fueling. If you go too big you will need to. Lean cars make more power than fat cars from the fueling perspective. Ideal A/F ratios are around 12.5:1. Z's with a full compliment of exhaust and intake mods still run richer than that per Semtex's dynos (11.8:1 or so). This is why tuning gets more power...It brings the car up to a better A/F ratio for power. Corrections will happen automatically with regular ECU adaptation. The stock MAF tubes are 2.34" in ID. As best as I can determine the Stillens are around 2.37" which is a 2.5% difference in surface area! More air + less fuel = more power. If you want to study up on some of the reasoning, check out my page here:
Modshack | Stage 2 MOFO (BAMM)
My initial Guestimate of a 2.5" ID seems pretty close. Just went out and ran the car for 40 miles and the long term fuel trims seem to average out to 0, + or - a few % points of correction. (BTW, The long term fuel trims or Partial throttle adjustment sets at the 20 mile mark after an ECU reset, then continues to adjust based on input from there on). 0% correction means the ECU is happy with the fuel mix and doesn't have to alter it to bring it into spec. A + number is a lean correction, a Minus is a rich correction. I need to put a few more miles on to see if this LTF % holds in that range. If it goes lean, I'll just cut some tubes a tad smaller.. It's all an experiment at this point...:tup:

RCZ 06-20-2009 04:03 PM

Cool, good to know sir thanks.

kdo2milger 06-21-2009 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Modshack (Post 95416)
Keep in mind this is a DIY with no intent of offering for commercial sale. I do build CAI's for another brand but those are well established and much simpler. This is just my personal project. Honestly, given the man hours invested, component costs, and fabrication needed to install as you see it, it could not be offered for a reasonable "bolt in" price...You have to "Macgyver" quite a few things which is generally not commercially acceptable. I fabricate on the fly so even duplicating this would be a chore.

Final fit with MAF tubes installed:
http://images49.fotki.com/v1500/phot...MG_1849-vi.jpg

You have shattered me!

ok..ok.. i'll start off with the group buy list...

1. kdo2milger
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
etc....

Caravanshaka 06-21-2009 07:49 PM

Ya, I'd be in it just for the MAF tube and the rest of hte tubing from the airbox to the intake manifold...too bad you don't plan on producing anymore :(

DJcuetip 06-22-2009 03:14 AM

word is someone is making those air flowing tubes jsut like you did!

Boost_lee 06-22-2009 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Modshack (Post 95524)
On the MAF: The diameter of the tubing at the MAF determines the velocity of the Air flow over the MAF. The MAF controls the fuel signal with the 02 sensor sending corrective info to the ECU. Since The stock Z runs rich, I am constantly seeing a -9 to 10% correction on the long term (Partial throttle) fuel trims. You can open up that tube "slightly", drop the velocity therefore reducing the MAF signal while upping the volume, and therefore bring the fuel trims closer to 0% where the car will make more power. It's a balancing act to do it right. Trust me, I've done a LOT of experimenting on this with the Audi's and have Hundreds of thousands of test miles on the Tubes I build for them. . Very careful tuning of the pipe diameter can result in real gains as long as you don't go to the extreme of needing to alter the fueling. If you go too big you will need to. Lean cars make more power than fat cars from the fueling perspective. Ideal A/F ratios are around 12.5:1. Z's with a full compliment of exhaust and intake mods still run richer than that per Semtex's dynos (11.8:1 or so). This is why tuning gets more power...It brings the car up to a better A/F ratio for power. Corrections will happen automatically with regular ECU adaptation. The stock MAF tubes are 2.34" in ID. As best as I can determine the Stillens are around 2.37" which is a 2.5% difference in surface area! More air + less fuel = more power. If you want to study up on some of the reasoning, check out my page here:
Modshack | Stage 2 MOFO (BAMM)
My initial Guestimate of a 2.5" ID seems pretty close. Just went out and ran the car for 40 miles and the long term fuel trims seem to average out to 0, + or - a few % points of correction. (BTW, The long term fuel trims or Partial throttle adjustment sets at the 20 mile mark after an ECU reset, then continues to adjust based on input from there on). 0% correction means the ECU is happy with the fuel mix and doesn't have to alter it to bring it into spec. A + number is a lean correction, a Minus is a rich correction. I need to put a few more miles on to see if this LTF % holds in that range. If it goes lean, I'll just cut some tubes a tad smaller.. It's all an experiment at this point...:tup:


:tup: good post, love this project

t-ray 06-22-2009 09:53 AM

I know this is a one-off, but do you have any intent on measuring gains on a dyno?

john370z 06-22-2009 09:53 AM

Modshack, Do you think there can be merrit to Takeda's claim of 20 hp because of the size of their inlet tube and mas air sensor tube? It seems larger than Stillen and others.
thanks

Modshack 06-22-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t-ray (Post 96893)
I know this is a one-off, but do you have any intent on measuring gains on a dyno?

I'll do it eventually. I'm designing more for Under the curve driveability than I am for a few HP at RPM's I rarely spend time at.

Quote:

Originally Posted by john370z (Post 96894)
Modshack, Do you think there can be merrit to Takeda's claim of 20 hp because of the size of their inlet tube and mas air sensor tube? It seems larger than Stillen and others.
thanks

Hard to say. It looks like they squeeze the pipes at the MAf mount area, but to what internal diameter I don't know. Necking down the pipe and then expanding it again does improve velocity (like a venturi) and could provide some leaning and more power depending on the ID. The placement of the MAF inside the tube will have an effect also as air flow through a tube is faster in the center than it is toward the outside. I'd tend to doubt that 20hp number though..

http://images50.fotki.com/v1528/phot...MG_1844-vi.jpg

t-ray 06-22-2009 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Modshack (Post 96935)
I'll do it eventually. I'm designing more for Under the curve driveability than I am for a few HP at RPM's I rarely spend time at.

That's precisely what I'd be interested in seeing in graphical form; not too concerned with absolute numbers, just the baseline/revised graphs overlayed.

Modshack 06-22-2009 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCal 370Z (Post 97033)
ARC Cool Fin

Now people might think this is joke, but ARC is a very serious company.

No doubt....A friend of mine who owns the local Rice shop has a very tricked out 350. He just put this stuff on his (larger) oil pan and rear Dif, figuring it could not hurt. I don't think he's actually measured any reduction (no cooler but he is instrumented) but he feels better about it anyway! Get heat dissipation any way you can.

semtex 06-22-2009 03:37 PM

"Cooling brings Ecology Life" Hmm . . . okie doke. :ugh2:

KidD 06-22-2009 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 97101)
"Cooling brings Ecology Life" Hmm . . . okie doke. :ugh2:

I would have to say that that is a poor traslation. :shakes head:

Modshack 06-23-2009 11:41 AM

Today's update: Unfortunately the 2.5" ID (+ 14% surface area) kept trending downward (Lean) and started to feel a little flat. Just a tad too big on the ID. I sleeved the MAF tubes today to bring them down to 2.42" (+ 6% surface areas) and things felt a lot snappier. As you can see, 1/10th of an inch makes a big difference here. Long term fuel trims seem to be trending back toward Zero. I'll run it this way for awhile and see where it goes. I have another sleeve available to take it to 2.37 if I need a little more....

Modshack 06-28-2009 02:03 PM

Fresh air feeds from the Fang area now up in the DIY section:

http://www.the370z.com/diy-section-d...ur-airbox.html

http://images50.fotki.com/v1514/phot...MG_1896-vi.jpg


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2