Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   Stillen HFC vs. BERK HFC (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/3455-stillen-hfc-vs-berk-hfc.html)

RCZ 04-14-2009 09:03 PM

The Berks arent carb legal either afaik. Aren't they only 49 state legal?

Also Balanbro, the second o2 sensor does nothing but check for cat deficiencies.

I for one, have found a different fix to this problem....I think I'm going with race pipes.

f4ifusion 04-14-2009 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 57007)
The Berks arent carb legal either afaik. Aren't they only 49 state legal?

yeah youre absolutely right, but does the stillen claim even that? its not on their site. It also doesn't claim to be OBDII compliant, thats a big deal in NC. i was just saying though, I'm still really new to this so set me straight if im jacked up!

Josh@STILLEN 04-14-2009 09:18 PM

No high-flow cats for these applications are CARB legal.. and while they will pass the sniffer test.. it's against federal law to replace your factory cats for use on the road. HFCs are sold with the intention that they will not be used on federal roads.

f4ifusion 04-14-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh@STILLEN (Post 57018)
No high-flow cats for these applications are CARB legal.. and while they will pass the sniffer test.. it's against federal law to replace your factory cats for use on the road. HFCs are sold with the intention that they will not be used on federal roads.

Thanks for clearing that up for me Josh. That makes a lot more sense to me now.

also wanted to mention that i just received your catback system and love it! I am definitely going to be getting your headers and g3 intake as well. great products

RCZ 04-14-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by f4ifusion (Post 57011)
yeah youre absolutely right, but does the stillen claim even that? its not on their site. It also doesn't claim to be OBDII compliant, thats a big deal in NC. i was just saying though, I'm still really new to this so set me straight if im jacked up!

OBDII compliant? OBDII is diagnostics system. Uses a port under your steering wheel to read whether you have had or have diagnostic codes triggered. What the heck does OBDII compliant mean? hehe I think you are talking about whether you have check engine lights or codes scannable with the OBDII scanner. Maybe? If you have triggered codes, you may not pass the test.

f4ifusion 04-14-2009 09:39 PM

yeah maybe compliant is the wrong word, maybe friendly, it was something i read on a post from kyle at importpartspro.....haha...thats what i was trying to say, maybe i just read it wrong. as little as i do know about this stuff i understand that its a diagnostic system.

wstar 04-14-2009 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 57007)
I for one, have found a different fix to this problem....I think I'm going with race pipes.

Plug the bungs and run O2 sims? :)

Josh@STILLEN 04-14-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 57046)
Plug the bungs and run O2 sims? :)

No can do.. the rear O2 sensors control fuel trims.. :)

EDIT: I should clarify.. secondary fuel trims associated with CELs..

wstar 04-14-2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh@STILLEN (Post 57050)
No can do.. the rear O2 sensors control fuel trims.. :)

Really? I figured that's why they had 4: the front ones to control the mix and the rear ones for emissions crap that doesn't really matter.

frost 04-14-2009 11:18 PM

This is an interesting thread, hopefully people take a look at it before plunging into purchasing HFCs. There is a little more to it with this car than I have experienced in my previous vehicles.

zman1910 04-14-2009 11:39 PM

Here's my take on things.

If your gonna get a CEL with HFC's, whether it be after 200 miles or 3k miles, might as well just get test pipes and maximize power output. It wouldn't make any sense considering the price of HFC's, unless you live in a highly regulated state like CA.

As someone previously stated, these things just come with the territory of modding. The light never bothered me but I guess I'm just so used to it that I never notice it anymore.

frost 04-14-2009 11:44 PM

I've done a lot of modding, including forced induction and I've never tolerated the light. But I do agree you may as well just get the test pipes anyway.

wstar 04-14-2009 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zman1910 (Post 57106)
Here's my take on things.

If your gonna get a CEL with HFC's, whether it be after 200 miles or 3k miles, might as well just get test pipes and maximize power output. It wouldn't make any sense considering the price of HFC's, unless you live in a highly regulated state like CA.

As someone previously stated, these things just come with the territory of modding. The light never bothered me but I guess I'm just so used to it that I never notice it anymore.

My old Trans Am has had a light for the past 20k miles or so. It's complaining about the EGR, might be because I completely removed the EGR system from the car. :icon17: It comes back every time I reset it, so I gave up. My programmer (a DiabloSport unit) is supposed to be able to permanently suppress it, but I never got that to work. Oh well :)

zman1910 04-14-2009 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 57111)
I've done a lot of modding, including forced induction and I've never tolerated the light. But I do agree you may as well just get the test pipes anyway.

I had an APS turbo'd 350. I was only concerned when that light wasn't on...:rofl2:

semtex 04-15-2009 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zman1910 (Post 57106)
Here's my take on things.

If your gonna get a CEL with HFC's, whether it be after 200 miles or 3k miles, might as well just get test pipes and maximize power output. It wouldn't make any sense considering the price of HFC's, unless you live in a highly regulated state like CA.

As someone previously stated, these things just come with the territory of modding. The light never bothered me but I guess I'm just so used to it that I never notice it anymore.

There are other reasons one might want to go with HFCs. Test pipes tend to have more rasp (even the resonated ones). And when I ran test pipes on my 350, the rear valance regularly got coated with a layer of black soot. So this time around I decided to go with HFCs. I haven't gotten a CEL with the HFCs, btw. At this point, I don't think a single person with a 370 has gotten a CEL from the Berk HFCs. All this talk about a fix is merely hypothetical at this point, i.e., what to do if and when we get a CEL. (I'm also the guy who said that CELs just come w/ the territory.)

ssqpolo 04-15-2009 07:55 AM

the test pipes only have a rasp for a slight moment (2600-2900rpm) under medium acceleration. but i loveeeeeeeeeeeeee the sound of them. super aggressive and almost like an exotic at the higher rpms. am i the only one with test pipes on the 370 here? as for my service engine light, i will try that ss wool this weekend maybe. if that doesnt work i will do the other fix when i have time (probably a couple of weeks). the light hardly bothers me anymore. the sound and performance of the pipes far outweighs the annoyance of the light.

NIZMOZ 04-15-2009 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 57065)
Really? I figured that's why they had 4: the front ones to control the mix and the rear ones for emissions crap that doesn't really matter.

Per UPREV this is correct. The rear ones only verify the cats are working and that is all. The car runs no different and these can be turned off in the ECU tuning.

semtex 04-15-2009 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssqpolo (Post 57206)
the test pipes only have a rasp for a slight moment (2600-2900rpm) under medium acceleration. but i loveeeeeeeeeeeeee the sound of them. super aggressive and almost like an exotic at the higher rpms. am i the only one with test pipes on the 370 here? as for my service engine light, i will try that ss wool this weekend maybe. if that doesnt work i will do the other fix when i have time (probably a couple of weeks). the light hardly bothers me anymore. the sound and performance of the pipes far outweighs the annoyance of the light.

Rasp doesn't bother me either, personally. I'm just pointing out that it does bother some people, so that's a legitimate reason to go with HFCs vs. test pipes. What ever happened to the dyno you were going to get on the Berk test pipes per your other thread? http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaus...mpression.html

I want to see numbers -- numbers are more meaningful than sound to me.

ssqpolo 04-15-2009 08:21 AM

the dyno that i will go to is a mustang dyno, so maybe we can compare my run with RCZs baseline (yes diff dyno/diff day). i will update that thread once i do it

semtex 04-15-2009 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssqpolo (Post 57220)
the dyno that i will go to is a mustang dyno, so maybe we can compare my run with RCZs baseline (yes diff dyno/diff day). i will update that thread once i do it

Cool! Thx man.

NIZMOZ 04-15-2009 09:09 AM

Test Pipes will cause the light to come on and there will be not much you can do to not prevent the light coming on with those. With HFCs though you have a chance of preventing it with the methods above. Also less rasp, less smell with HFCs.

Not sure why Stillen (maybe due to lack of experience as they don't specialize in ecu tuning) keeps saying the o2's behind the cats that do the fuel adjustments when it's the front o2's that do the fuel/air adjustments as they need a reading before they hit the cats. UPREV has already disabled these o2s on several cars with no issues.

ssqpolo 04-15-2009 10:26 AM

nice. we got a guy on the inside. haha. so how do u propose to fix the code that the computer is spitting Jesse? uprev?

ssqpolo 04-15-2009 10:32 AM

^^ you definitely have more knowledge than i do. I completely agree that only the first 02 have an effect of fuel. i think NismoZ brought that point up too

RCZ 04-15-2009 12:34 PM

I think some of your guys are misinterpreting Stillen, this is why he edited to add that they specifically affect CEL. The rear only checks for cat deficiency. The fronts control fuel under load, aka when it matters. You can drive the car with the rear o2 sensors completely unplugged and it wont affect anything. Its the CEL's that you have to worry about if you don't like lights on the dash like me.

wstar 04-15-2009 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 57328)
I think some of your guys are misinterpreting Stillen, this is why he edited to add that they specifically affect CEL. The rear only checks for cat deficiency. The fronts control fuel under load, aka when it matters. You can drive the car with the rear o2 sensors completely unplugged and it wont affect anything. Its the CEL's that you have to worry about if you don't like lights on the dash like me.

Right, he was responding to my comment about O2 sims. While the rears are only for emissions purposes (CEL), they can't be fooled with simple sims, because the ECU is actually looking for them to respond to small changes in fuel delivery. Killing the rear O2 without a CEL would require either a very advanced O2 sim/replacement that bases its outputs on what the car is actually doing (doesn't exist), or reflashing the ECU to ignore them.

RCZ 04-15-2009 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 57331)
or reflashing the ECU to ignore them.

He shoots he scores.

import111 04-15-2009 02:17 PM

With my 2005 STi, I just zip tied the rear o2 sensor under the car, so it was never screwed into the exhaust. I never had an issue.

wstar 04-15-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesse (Post 57418)
Now ill rock your brains. I can problably find out exactly what the computer wants to see as far as cats and rear o2 sensors. What I mean is..... The computer is looking to see the rear o2 sensor voltage within a certian percentage of the one before it on the same bank. If we could wire a resistor between the rear o2 and the front o2 tricking the computer in seeing it within that range at all times....eliminating the need for cats at all, eliminating the rear o2sensors and eliminating the check engine light. The computer wouldnt have a problem with catalyst light off time cause it would allways be in the perfect voltage range. This may even be easier with the wide band o2's the z uses right from the factory. The voltage does not swing like old school o2sensors. This is just my nerd smog tech mechanic theory. anyone heard of someone trying this? I know I can find the information with my resources........is that a pimp idea or what?!

Odds are good anyone running HFCs or Test Pipes is going to get their ECU replaced / piggybacked / reflashed anyways, once those solutions become available. Fixing it via the ECU will be much simpler.

ChrisSlicks 04-15-2009 03:09 PM

In theory if the secondary O2 sensor always sends a lower voltage than the front then the resistor trick could work. However in reality it could get a little more complicated than that as I'm not sure that the voltage response of the O2 sensor is linear.

The dummy sensors are similar, however they always send back a fixed voltage according to what the ideal is supposed to be.

wstar 04-15-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks (Post 57422)
In theory if the secondary O2 sensor always sends a lower voltage than the front then the resistor trick could work. However in reality it could get a little more complicated than that as I'm not sure that the voltage response of the O2 sensor is linear.

The dummy sensors are similar, however they always send back a fixed voltage according to what the ideal is supposed to be.

It's more than that even. Even the existing dummy O2's that don't work for us don't send back a fixed voltage, they send back an oscillating signal.

ETA: Making custom O2 simulators

BalanBro 04-15-2009 06:48 PM

I'm still wondering one thing, doesn't each bank have 2 cats (4 total for both banks?) The typical OBDII arangement was:

O2/AFR-->1st cat(usually in OEM manifold)--> 2nd O2/AFR-->2nd (downstream) cat

I was under the impression that the HFC replaces only the downstream cat (after the last sensor). So how would the sensor know whats going on further downstream? It should only be monitoring the upstream catalyst efficiency in theory.

Please tell me if I'm wrong here because I'm assuming this based on the late 90's OBDII cars I am familiar with.

wstar 04-15-2009 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BalanBro (Post 57551)
I'm still wondering one thing, doesn't each bank have 2 cats (4 total for both banks?) The typical OBDII arangement was:

O2/AFR-->1st cat(usually in OEM manifold)--> 2nd O2/AFR-->2nd (downstream) cat

I was under the impression that the HFC replaces only the downstream cat (after the last sensor). So how would the sensor know whats going on further downstream? It should only be monitoring the upstream catalyst efficiency in theory.

Please tell me if I'm wrong here because I'm assuming this based on the late 90's OBDII cars I am familiar with.

I've never heard of 4 cats, but maybe on some weird vehicles...

Our car only has 1 cat per bank. The arrangement on our car is Exhaust Manifold -> Cat -> (rest of exhaust), and there's an O2/AFR sensor in the exhaust manifold, and another O2 sensor right after the cat. The one in the manifold is the expensive wideband one that the ECU uses to regulate AFR. The simpler O2 after the cat is just used to validate that the Cat is functioning properly.

zman1910 04-15-2009 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 57203)
There are other reasons one might want to go with HFCs. Test pipes tend to have more rasp (even the resonated ones). And when I ran test pipes on my 350, the rear valance regularly got coated with a layer of black soot. So this time around I decided to go with HFCs. I haven't gotten a CEL with the HFCs, btw. At this point, I don't think a single person with a 370 has gotten a CEL from the Berk HFCs. All this talk about a fix is merely hypothetical at this point, i.e., what to do if and when we get a CEL. (I'm also the guy who said that CELs just come w/ the territory.)

Of course there are always other reasons, no one ever doubted that. However, the majority of people are looking for maximum gain(95+%).

I've had both(pipes and HFC's) on various cars and I've always thrown a CEL....every last time.

If it doesn't happen with the 370Z than that's a great thing, but I think it's way too early to even make it seem like a code will not be thrown.

gmag21 04-15-2009 10:52 PM

Hello everyone,

I'm new to this forum.. ill be getting my 370z in june.

Im thinking about getting the Berk HFC's. where can i buy this 02 simulator thing or whatever? What exactly does it do?? Im kinda a noob so go easy on me :P

(thinkin about gettin the stillen headers, exhaust, and CAI; berk hfc, and hotchki sway bars- lemme know what u guys think of that setup)

Any information of this 02 thing is appreciated lol,

Thanks,

Grant

BerkTech 04-16-2009 07:21 PM

The ECU will only look at the secondary O2 sensor during closed loop operation (i.e. lean burn, steady freeway cruise, idle, etc). The ECU will make small adjustments to the fuel trims based on the small adjustments made during closed loop operation. This is on the order of a few percentage points. I don't recall ever seeing anything over +/-5% in the last couple of years.

If you guys have ever called Berk for tech support you've heard us say, "Clear the ECU learned values before running the HFC's. You will run less of a chance of throwing a CEL light". Over time your ECU may have adjusted based on your driving habits. By clearing the fuel trims you give your ECU a chance to start back at zero and readjust to the new cats. The cat is in essence an oxygen storage device. When installing a BERK HFC that flows twice as much as the OEM cat it does not have enough contact time with the catalyst to "scrub" the exhaust gas and let the reaction occur. So the O2 readings will be different. Most of the time the thresholds of CEL or no CEL are large enough that the ECU will readapt and the CEL will stay off. However some of you who were already operating on the outer range will pass that threshold after a few drive cycles and illuminate the CEL light.

During driving situations where the engine sees load it will completely ignore the secondary O2 sensor and go off of it's pre-programs maps. On one of our race cars we actually did not use any O2 sensors at all! We would run completely off the pre-programed maps on the stand alone. We would make small tweaks to the maps for high altitude race tracks and summer/winter weather.

So, the moral of the story..... the secondary O2 sensors technically DO make tiny fuel adjustments in concert with the primary wide band sensor in the header, but only to make the car run as clean and lean as possible during steady cruise. From the stand point of the car enthusiast, they don't do squat! :)

And to set the record straight in plain black and white:

Berk HFC's are not SMOG legal in CA. Can they pass a sniffer test? Yes, all the time. But Berk Technology does not guarantee emmisions performance.

The vast majority of you will never thorw a CEL. However there is a very small percentage of you who will throw the occasional P0420/P0430 CEL. Down the road there will also be a very small percentage of you who throw those CEL codes with the OEM cats!

Hope that gives you some good info to chew on!

Cheers guys!
Berk Technology

RCZ 04-16-2009 08:36 PM

excellent Berk. thanks for that post.

Now can you please get some pipes in stock ? ;)

ssqpolo 04-16-2009 08:42 PM

^^ya berk. he's even tryna buy mine off of me!

Josh@STILLEN 04-17-2009 01:17 AM

Actually Jesse, Berk is dead on when it comes to the function of the secondary O2 sensors based upon my conversation with my R&D guys today on a different application that rolled into this discussion.

My understanding (and I'm in marketing, but privy to a lot of the tech going on) in regards to these sensors (including their function on previous Z's and the G35/G37s) is their drivability control, the secondary fuel trim function, when you're not under hard throttle situations where pre-loaded maps take function. Idle, cruising, CELs can be affected.

I'm not going to comment on your knowledge, obviously I would have no idea, but in regards to this car, engine, and applications, I wouldn't be so quick to discredit some of the people posting on this forum..

NIZMOZ 04-17-2009 07:52 AM

Actually one section of your post you are wrong.

Nissan ECU's do adjust for the type of driving you do. If you drove like a granny for a long time, then wanted to use the power out of your car for a road course or something your car would not feel like it has the power as it once did. I have seen this on many Nissans. Once you drive it aggressive after a while, it learns your driving again and makes the adjustments.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesse (Post 58303)
Cats are not oxygen storage devices. They convert carbon monoxide ( CO) Hydrocarbons (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), into more friendly Carbon Dioxide and water. The precious metals used in the manufacture of cats (platinum, rhodium and palladium) will clean themselves if the input gasses are in the correct ratios. that is why it is critical that a vehicles fuel management system and air injection system are working properly (going from slightly rich to slightly lean) and injecting air at the right places at the right time (if air equiped).

Both the 'dual bed' and 'monolith' cats need differing amounts of oxygen to perform the gas conversions. The platinum or palladium metals require high levels of O2 to convert CO (carbon monoxide) and HC (raw fuel 'hydrocarbons') into water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2). The rhodium element however operates well in the absence of oxygen to convert NOx into NO and O2. By comparison, the single bed catalyst only works on CO and HC.

In no way does a computer adjust to accommodate different catalysts (hence cel). The computer is programmed to 'feed' the cat to make it as efficient as possible and watch its degradation over time setting a code once it gets below a certian efficiency.

Also, closed loop is not 'lean burn, steady cruse, or idling. :shakes head: Closed loop simply means the oxygen sensors are heated enough to control fuel. (some cars coolant temp needs to be up also).

all engines are different and degrade so a 'fuel trim' is incorporated. I believe the limits to set a cel are +/-13percent.....I think....been a while since I reviewed this basic stuff.

Your computer does NOT adjust to your driving habits:shakes head: it just learns what the MOTOR needs at different conditions. Your computer is not going to re-tune itself to a race setting just because you race it. Now it may feel better over time if your computer is still learning to adjust to something like intake and exhaust. if these items increase air flow, your computer will learn over time to adjust with more fuel....making more power. You guys should drive your vehicle a couple weeks before you dyno your new parts!!!

By the way...your basically saying your cats flow good, but are crap when it comes to doing the job a cat was meant to do....CONVERT!

and your quote "During driving situations where the engine sees load it will completely ignore the secondary O2 sensor and go off of it's pre-programs maps. " ----what are you talking about? when your driving the engine is always under load unless you take your foot off going downhill. Your computer uses pre-loaded maps when under HARD acceleration. Also, your computer wants to see you driving a certian way before it will even run a catalyst monitor. For example, it wont check the cat if you go over 65mph or if your throttle position sensor is all over the place, if there is a problem with another sensor or not under the right load.....ect.

Your race car runs pre-programmed cause you have tuned tuned tuned with a dyno and you know what you want the settings at. In the real world for everyday driving in a car that changes over time...this wont work well. you would have to have a computer that adapts to the changing engine or keep re-tuning it every so many years.

Sorry to rant and rave...I think I got a contact high from my roomate. And he wont shut up about his Vegas trip!


NIZMOZ 04-17-2009 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh@STILLEN (Post 58336)
Actually Jesse, Berk is dead on when it comes to the function of the secondary O2 sensors based upon my conversation with my R&D guys today on a different application that rolled into this discussion.

My understanding (and I'm in marketing, but privy to a lot of the tech going on) in regards to these sensors (including their function on previous Z's and the G35/G37s) is their drivability control, the secondary fuel trim function, when you're not under hard throttle situations where pre-loaded maps take function. Idle, cruising, CELs can be affected.

I'm not going to comment on your knowledge, obviously I would have no idea, but in regards to this car, engine, and applications, I wouldn't be so quick to discredit some of the people posting on this forum..



X2, but still the 2nd O2s on these cars do not make adjustments to the Fuel trims period. Ask Technosquare or UPREV and they will tell you the same.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2