Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   Stillen Headers + Berk HFCs self-install report (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/2885-stillen-headers-berk-hfcs-self-install-report.html)

semtex 04-02-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks (Post 51042)
I'm not sure I understand. If you're using stock sized (but lightweight) pulleys then the power delivery to the supercharger should be the same? If you change the pulley size then obviously that is going to have an affect.

Someone else could probably explain this better than me, but let me give it a shot. The whole purpose of underdrive pulleys is to supply power to secondary items such as the A/C. Power supplied to those items is power diverted away from the wheels (you can actually feel a slight loss when you turn the A/C on if you pay careful attention). Thing is, the pulleys usually supply more power than those secondary things actually need, hence there's room to reduce the amount of power supplied by the pulleys without negatively impacting the ability of those secondary systems to function properly. And the power that is saved goes directly back to power at the wheels. Now enter in superchargers. Superchargers draw their power in the exact same way as other secondary systems such as A/C. So whereas it's perfectly okay to divert some power away from the A/C unit, you don't want to do that to a supercharger, because then it'd be as though you're purposely handicapping your supercharger. Make sense? Let me know if it doesn't, and I can ask Josh to chime in with a better explanation.

semtex 04-02-2009 01:25 PM

Hey wstar and RCZ, you know what's conspicuously absent from our list? Lightweight flywheel. Do either of you plan to get one?

ChrisSlicks 04-02-2009 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 51052)
Someone else could probably explain this better than me, but let me give it a shot. The whole purpose of underdrive pulleys is to supply power to secondary items such as the A/C. Power supplied to those items is power diverted away from the wheels (you can actually feel a slight loss when you turn the A/C on if you pay careful attention). Thing is, the pulleys usually supply more power than those secondary things actually need, hence there's room to reduce the amount of power supplied by the pulleys without negatively impacting the ability of those secondary systems to function properly. And the power that is saved goes directly back to power at the wheels. Now enter in superchargers. Superchargers draw their power in the exact same way as other secondary systems such as A/C. So whereas it's perfectly okay to divert some power away from the A/C unit, you don't want to do that to a supercharger, because then it'd be as though you're purposely handicapping your supercharger. Make sense? Let me know if it doesn't, and I can ask Josh to chime in with a better explanation.

Thanks. Yes, I understand that under-drive scenario, but Stillen also makes lightweight pulleys that are identical to stock except for weight. I was wondering if they would net a measurable increase due to a slight reduction in rotating mass. I'm guess not, as the reduction is only 3.4 pounds which is nothing compared to the engine and flywheel, not to mention transmission. Obviously for NA it would be better to use the under-drive pulleys.

wstar 04-02-2009 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 51064)
Hey wstar and RCZ, you know what's conspicuously absent from our list? Lightweight flywheel. Do either of you plan to get one?

I suspect the flywheel is for 6MT only, I have an auto. For you 6MT guys, the lighter pulley and flywheel will give you a quicker revving engine when you're shifting. I doubt the actual horsepower gains under load are very noticeable though.

semtex 04-02-2009 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks (Post 51071)
Thanks. Yes, I understand that under-drive scenario, but Stillen also makes lightweight pulleys that are identical to stock except for weight. I was wondering if they would net a measurable increase due to a slight reduction in rotating mass. I'm guess not, as the reduction is only 3.4 pounds which is nothing compared to the engine and flywheel, not to mention transmission. Obviously for NA it would be better to use the under-drive pulleys.

Check it out. What timing!
http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivet...-released.html

ssqpolo 04-02-2009 02:26 PM

wont changing pulleys and flywheel make it a bitch to drive tho

semtex 04-02-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssqpolo (Post 51112)
wont changing pulleys and flywheel make it a bitch to drive tho

How so? Can you elaborate on what you think might happen that'll make it hard to drive? Not enough torque off the line or something?

RCZ 04-02-2009 04:06 PM

nah semtex, I already mentioned this in the other thread.

let me find it for you...

EDIT: Here you go

On UD Pulley

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 43886)
An underdriven pulley isn't the same as a lightened pulley. UD Pulleys are different sizes than the stock ones and as used to reduce hp-stealing parasitic resistance from the system. The problem with that is that there are some associated issues with under driving accessories like the AC and the alternator and may cause them to not perform the way they are supposed to. Most of the pulley derived power gains aren't from underdriving though...they are from weight savings. Underdriven pulleys seem to perform better than lightened ones because they too tend to be a lot lighter than stock so they have both added benefits.

This is only a problem for UD pulleys which aren't well designed for the car. I am 100% sure this won't be an issue with the STILLEN pulley.

On having both lighter pulley and flywheel

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 41693)
Its all good ssqpolo - The reason that it may become a problem is because of the clutch engagement. The mass of the stock flywheel allows you to engage the clutch at low RPM's and without much jerkiness. The inertia of the spinning mass (flywheel) counteracts the clutch as it tries to clamp down, therefore allowing for smoother, gradual engagement. If you get rid of that mass, then the flywheel will slow down to match shaft speed much faster (jerkier) and you may sometimes stall if you aren't being careful or giving it enough revs. This is a common issue with the Carrera GT, the drivetrain / flywheel is so light that engaging first gear can be a tricky endeavor. Often people don't give it enough revs...or too many.

By lightening the flywheel AND the pulley, you are making it even worst. Some people would advice that you do one or the other. Usually it is better to go with the flywheel because there's more performance to be gained there...However, on some cars, it is OK to do both...Hence my question :)

I have a feeling this isnt going to be a problem with the 370Z. I think we can do both pulley and flywheel.

zeebra 04-02-2009 04:38 PM

I had a horrible experience with Pulleys on the 350.. Not sure if it was the install or the bad pulley out of the batch.. A year of wobbling caused my crankshaft to almost strip the thread off - leading to a new crankshaft for what a couple horsepower a little better response? In and out of shops not knowing what was wrong. Put a stock pulley back on it and bought a new crank bolt and got rid of the car after a couple thousand miles.

If your in need of horsepower that badly Id skip all the bolt-ons and go FI for a couple thousand more..

Somethings arent meant to change.. Something connected to the main component of your motor is one of them IMO.

RCZ 04-02-2009 04:46 PM

I disagree...how about you make sure things are installed right and enjoy the benefits of a more responsive engine and a some hp?

If we are going to be afraid of things because they aren't installed properly, then you would be insane to think that a FI setup is less risky, and that is by your own logic, don't you think?

This is a good mod, but like anything else, if you don't install it right then you can't expect good results. Also let me tell you, you got off easy..that could have been SO much worse.

Josh@STILLEN 04-02-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeebra (Post 51161)
I had a horrible experience with Pulleys on the 350.. Not sure if it was the install or the bad pulley out of the batch.. A year of wobbling caused my crankshaft to almost strip the thread off - leading to a new crankshaft for what a couple horsepower a little better response? In and out of shops not knowing what was wrong. Put a stock pulley back on it and bought a new crank bolt and got rid of the car after a couple thousand miles.

If your in need of horsepower that badly Id skip all the bolt-ons and go FI for a couple thousand more..

Somethings arent meant to change.. Something connected to the main component of your motor is one of them IMO.

Who's pulley was it?

A pulley is NOT something you want to take a chance on with a sub-par vendor. Don't go thinking you're going to save $$ and find one on ebay, you are opening yourself up to potential problems.

Not all pulleys are the same.. by any means. Thanks zeebra, you bring up a good point.

LiquidZ 04-02-2009 05:37 PM

I have had pulleys on all of my cars. However, the gain you get from what you risk is not worth it.

wstar 04-02-2009 09:43 PM

Ok I'm re-hijacking my thread back for a bit.

Just got the Stillen cat-back installed. I raised the "center" section at the spot indicated in the instructions with a floor jack to try to get the system clear of the chassis crossmember, but in the end after I torqued everything down, it still dropped in a bit and came to rest on that crossmember. So clearly, I'll have to go back and loosen all the bolts and tweak this some more to get it to sit right.

However, I went ahead and fired it up for a short test drive. Words cannot describe how awesome the full exhaust setup sounds, and when I make an audio recording later, I'm sure it won't do justice to the live thing. Whoever was worried about the headers making it too high-pitched, I don't think you have anything to worry about. It's a really nice low growl (at low rpms), and changes predictably with load and rpms.

All that said, on the test drive I still had an odd rasp/buzz/whatever sound at certain RPMs under acceleration load on the road. Although the sound characteristics of the exhaust have completely changed, I recognize this as a sound that was bothering me before, ever since the cats/headers went in. I'm starting to think I must have a leak issue somewhere up in the area of the cats/headers still, which I'll also have to sort out. I may just run down to an exhaust shop sometime tomorrow and have someone who looks at this stuff every day listen around under the car and try to find it.

Anyways, minor install issues that are undoubtedly my fault aside, it's awesome. I think the catback really let loose a lot of pent-up gains from the headers and cats, I could definitely feel a real difference on the road. And the sound is amazing, although it borders on the territory of too loud, in a "My neighbors are all going to hate me now" sort of way. Not loud like a fart can on a civic, loud like standing in the pits at a NASCAR event.

Audio soon...

Josh@STILLEN 04-02-2009 09:51 PM

Awesome wstar!

The rasp you're hearing is most likely from the HFCs, and it's sort of par for the course. You want the increased horsepower, but it will add some rasp (although seemingly far less than previous year Z's).. Test pipes take that to another level..

But it will absolutely not hurt to run everything through and make sure their are no leaks, that will definitely add to the noise, and not in a good way.

The cat-back can take some adjustment, and a lot of people have asked us why there is adjustment in our exhaust systems. The answer, unfortunately, is back to Nissan, in that the stock exhausts don't always line up, and rarely are on spot. The cars are just built slightly differently. Most people don't notice because they aren't staring at the brand new part they just installed, the entire car is new. We go the extra step in allowing for minor adjustments to compensate.

Congrats on the new exhaust! Glad you're feeling the results others have been documenting..

alan93rsa 04-02-2009 11:25 PM

Josh is correct. The OEM's test individual components on a jig. The jig has plus/minus tolerances. If on one side the tolerances stack to the plus side while the other stacks to the minus side you will have issues.

wstar 04-02-2009 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh@STILLEN (Post 51289)
Awesome wstar!

The rasp you're hearing is most likely from the HFCs, and it's sort of par for the course. You want the increased horsepower, but it will add some rasp (although seemingly far less than previous year Z's).. Test pipes take that to another level..

Well I think I know what you mean about the cat rasp, and I don't really mind that sound at all. I think I have something else going on too, some weak spot that doesn't really leak at idle or even revving under no load, but adds a pronounced buzzy sound to the exhaust note at certain rpms under accel. I've noticed also that if I engine-brake back through that same range, the buzz is replaced by a hiss like pressurized air leaking, which I'm guessing is also a good sign of a leak.

In any case, I've got a short vid from this evening so people can get some idea about the sound. The ugly buzz I'm talking about doesn't really come through on the video (odd). Then again, neither do the low frequencies either (I guess my mini-dv's mic sucks). You may think it sounds low and grumbly rolling around the parking lot at the start of the video, but the video is really missing most of the even lower frequencies. It's even more beastly in person. Under acceleration the audio track sometimes seems like the car gets quieter as it passes through certain RPM ranges - again that's the low frequencies the mic can't handle, seems to kinda mute the rest. There's no full-throttle runs in this, mostly light throttle just rolling up and down the rpms a bit. There's one good 3/4 throttle run through a couple of gears near the end though.

-- bleh youtube "processing" is taking forever this evening...
[YOUTUBEHQ]YS98sdExjz4[/YOUTUBEHQ]

semtex 04-03-2009 09:51 AM

Dude that sounds awesome! When will you be getting a dyno? Recall that RelentlessRY said he saw a loss of torque in the mid-range with these headers, but we suspect that it's because he had the stock cats & cat-back, and that this issue goes away when the headers are combined with HFCs and a good cat-back. Now all we need is a dyno to confirm once and for all (which is why I'm so eager). Still, thanks for the video, as it at least puts to rest the 'high-pitched sound' concern. +rep.

ChrisSlicks 04-03-2009 09:57 AM

Sounds great! Rep added.

It sounds a little more hollow but that is to be expected.

semtex 04-03-2009 10:04 AM

Yeah, I think I need these headers. *sigh* I'm going to have to take the wife shopping. Again.

JohnnyBgood 04-03-2009 10:22 AM

wstar--I'm having the same hissing sound with my cat/exhaust set-up. I'm taking mine to a muffler shop next week to get them to check for leaks and do some seam welding. I noticed there's very little room for error in the small pipe going to the exhaust from the x-pipe. I'm almost positive that's where my leak is coming from. Nothing a quick hit from a torch won't fix!

LiquidZ 04-03-2009 10:37 AM

Damn I'm at work and will have to wait another 5 hours to hear the full setup.

semtex 04-03-2009 10:50 AM

Alright, I have given in to temptation. I have ordered the headers. When in doubt, pull the credit card out. :rolleyes:

RCZ 04-03-2009 12:01 PM

lmao, Im about to pull the trigger on something else too :)

wstar 04-03-2009 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 51465)
Alright, I have given in to temptation. I have ordered the headers. When in doubt, pull the credit card out. :rolleyes:

That's the spirit :)

I picked up an extra bottle jack this morning so I can manipulate the position of the exhaust from more places at once. Later today I'm going to put the whole car on stands (when I did the catback I just raised the rear), loosen *everything* up to and including the cat<->header bolts (but not header<->engine obviously), and get it lined up correctly with 2 jacks (supporting the Y-pipe and the center section), and see if I can get it off the crossmember permanently. Then I'll re-torque again, and if the "leak" sound is still there (and/or I can't get it off the crossmember), it's going to an exhaust shop tomorrow.

I really want to get this sorted out definitively so I can move on to the intakes this weekend, and then schedule a dyno for next week.

semtex 04-03-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 51482)
lmao, Im about to pull the trigger on something else too :)

And what, pray tell, would that be? We have ourselves a little 'arms race' going between us! :p

semtex 04-03-2009 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 51483)
That's the spirit :)

I picked up an extra bottle jack this morning so I can manipulate the position of the exhaust from more places at once. Later today I'm going to put the whole car on stands (when I did the catback I just raised the rear), loosen *everything* up to and including the cat<->header bolts (but not header<->engine obviously), and get it lined up correctly with 2 jacks (supporting the Y-pipe and the center section), and see if I can get it off the crossmember permanently. Then I'll re-torque again, and if the "leak" sound is still there, it's going to an exhaust shop tomorrow.

I really want to get this sorted out definitively so I can move on to the intakes this weekend, and then schedule a dyno for next week.

LOL. I read that as "I picked up an extra bottle of jack this morning . . ." I was like . . . how is getting lit up on Jack Daniels going to help?? :confused:

Anyway, FYI my exhaust did the exact same thing you're describing, and I had to spend time making adjustments and tweaks as well. So, nothing out of the ordinary.

wstar 04-03-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 51486)
LOL. I read that as "I picked up an extra bottle of jack this morning . . ." I was like . . . how is getting lit up on Jack Daniels going to help?? :confused:

A bottle of JD might do me and the car both some good today. Been under there too long the past two days, need a real break :)

Quote:

Anyway, FYI my exhaust did the exact same thing you're describing, and I had to spend time making adjustments and tweaks as well. So, nothing out of the ordinary.
Yeah, so I just got done with the exhaust stuff again. It still hits the crossmember. I had it solidly 2 inches off of the thing when everything (boths sides of the cats and on back) was retorqued (with great precision to exactly "omfg I think I just broke my arm" ft/lbs), but then it falls right back onto the crossmember when I let the last bottle jack down. That's just where the hangers hang at. The jack is just lifting the whole thing up on the rubber hangers, and then letting it back down to their limit afterwards.

The upside is, I did find that 2 of the 6 bolts connecting the cats to the headers weren't properly torqued down when I went to loosen them (the hardest ones to reach, which makes sense). They were probably better, but insufficient, earlier on and had now shaken loose enough to notice. Getting that done right got rid of the ugly buzz I was talking about. The exhaust sounds perfect now. There's still a little odd rumble I can hear when the car is at crawling speed, but it's easily identifiable as the the center section vibrating against the crossmember it's laying on. Maybe I can just get some kind of rubber pad that can resist exhaust heat and stuff it between them? I donno at this point. Or shorten the rubber hangers (or bend the posts that go into them) somehow.

That "air pressure" noise I was talking about before is still there, most noticeably when gently engine braking around the 3k-ish region. I think it's just normal, as there's no other indication of a leak in the exhaust note anymore, yet if anything that sound got a little more noticeable. I kinda like it actually, as long as it's nothing bad.

Anyways, I'm not letting the crossmember thing get my spirits down. The car sounds and feels insanely good right now.

I think I'll do the intakes this weekend now for sure, although it may have to wait until Sunday, as I've got a big all-day drinking/bbq -type thing to attend during the day tomorrow.

ChrisSlicks 04-03-2009 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 51647)
I think I'll do the intakes this weekend now for sure, although it may have to wait until Sunday, as I've got a big all-day drinking/bbq -type thing to attend during the day tomorrow.

That sounds like a great plan. It's the first auto-x tomorrow and the forecast is rain turning to snow. :wtf: Of course Sunday when the Porsche club get it's turn it is going to be nice and sunny, go figure.

There might be some other way to adjust those exhaust hangers, maybe someone from Stillen might know, might be worth a call.

semtex 04-03-2009 05:08 PM

Mine still touches the crossmember a little bit now and then as well. I have a sneaking suspicion it's the Berks throwing things off ever so slightly. I mean think about it. When Stillen developed this exhaust, they hooked it up to stock cats. If the dimensions of the Berks deviate from the stock cats ever so slightly, it could throw off how the exhaust lines up.

wstar 04-05-2009 09:33 PM

A couple of updates:

I ran by an exhaust shop Saturday morning. They heated up the hangers for the center section with a torch and bent them a bit to get more clearance at the crossmember. It's no longer laying on it, but it still kinda touches and rattles there a bit, depending on exhaust temps and the phase of the moon. Hopefully I'll get it sorted out permanently soon.

I got the Stillen Gen3 intakes put on today, which completes all the major boltons (Intake, Headers, Cats, Cat-back). The install is really pretty easy, although it takes a little thought and tweaking up where the filters are. Butt dyno is still pretty impressed, the sound coming out of them is nice. I've only driven about 10 miles on them so far though, so the ECU probably hasn't even caught up with the changes yet.

I'm going to go back by that exhaust shop sometime early this week and have them sort out the crossmember issue once and for all somehow (and maybe have them weld the slip-joints so the clamps can be removed), and then schedule a dyno for the setup. I'm really interested in how the dyno looks now. My Butt Dyno impressions so far is that the upper rpm range is better all around, but I may have traded a little low-rpm torque for it (which is kinda expected with such a free-flowing exhaust setup).

LiquidZ 04-07-2009 09:06 AM

Thank you so much for the review.

tru_Asiatik 04-10-2009 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 51647)
A bottle of JD might do me and the car both some good today. Been under there too long the past two days, need a real break :)



Yeah, so I just got done with the exhaust stuff again. It still hits the crossmember. I had it solidly 2 inches off of the thing when everything (boths sides of the cats and on back) was retorqued (with great precision to exactly "omfg I think I just broke my arm" ft/lbs), but then it falls right back onto the crossmember when I let the last bottle jack down. That's just where the hangers hang at. The jack is just lifting the whole thing up on the rubber hangers, and then letting it back down to their limit afterwards.

The upside is, I did find that 2 of the 6 bolts connecting the cats to the headers weren't properly torqued down when I went to loosen them (the hardest ones to reach, which makes sense). They were probably better, but insufficient, earlier on and had now shaken loose enough to notice. Getting that done right got rid of the ugly buzz I was talking about. The exhaust sounds perfect now. There's still a little odd rumble I can hear when the car is at crawling speed, but it's easily identifiable as the the center section vibrating against the crossmember it's laying on. Maybe I can just get some kind of rubber pad that can resist exhaust heat and stuff it between them? I donno at this point. Or shorten the rubber hangers (or bend the posts that go into them) somehow.

That "air pressure" noise I was talking about before is still there, most noticeably when gently engine braking around the 3k-ish region. I think it's just normal, as there's no other indication of a leak in the exhaust note anymore, yet if anything that sound got a little more noticeable. I kinda like it actually, as long as it's nothing bad.

Anyways, I'm not letting the crossmember thing get my spirits down. The car sounds and feels insanely good right now.

I think I'll do the intakes this weekend now for sure, although it may have to wait until Sunday, as I've got a big all-day drinking/bbq -type thing to attend during the day tomorrow.


hi can you take a picture of where it is hitting??
just bought the stillen exhaust/berk hfc combe and want to know ahead of time what to look for when im doing the installation
thank you very much :D

semtex 04-10-2009 08:00 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by tru_Asiatik (Post 54424)
hi can you take a picture of where it is hitting??
just bought the stillen exhaust/berk hfc combe and want to know ahead of time what to look for when im doing the installation
thank you very much :D

Here are pics of my car. Not sure if it's the exact same thing that wstar is experiencing tho, but my guess is that it is.

tru_Asiatik 04-10-2009 08:40 AM

^^thank you very much kind sir :tup:

is the rattle that bad?do you guys forsee damge in the long run if it keeps on hitting it??

semtex 04-10-2009 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tru_Asiatik (Post 54520)
^^thank you very much kind sir :tup:

is the rattle that bad?do you guys forsee damge in the long run if it keeps on hitting it??

Well, you can adjust it. I took the pics above to send to my mechanic to say 'hey, we have a problem, take a look at this!'. So after I sent them, he came back, got under my car, and was able to adjust it. The rattle is mostly gone now. But the tolerances are still very tight in that spot, and every now and then I'll hear a little rattle if my car is at a certain incline or something. But it's not enough to make me worried, and my mechanic said he saw no signs of actual wear on the spot that was making intermittent contact.

Now, one thing to keep in mind is that I don't have the headers yet. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that the headers don't change the geometry more and make things worse! I'm getting the headers put on some time next week, so we'll find out. wstar has the headers, so part of me is wondering if his problem is worse because of them.

wstar 04-10-2009 09:15 AM

Yes that's the same spot mine hits at. It won't destroy anything in the short term, you just don't want to hear it rattling. After I failed to get it clear myself, I went to a nearby random exhaust place earlier in the week, and they didn't do much good either.

Then I hit a well-known performance shop around here early this morning, who in turn referred me to a muffler shop down the road where they said the guy was an exhaust genius. Just got back from there. He got me clear of the crossmember and the rear swaybar and those diagonal links, but it took some pretty intense tweaking (he heated up the pipes at a couple of strategic points with a torch and bent them a little).

He also welded up the slip-fit seams for me. I'm definitely not rattling against anything anymore. I'm going to get under it tonight again myself and try to triple-check the bolts on the headers (and everything else) to make sure I'm not leaking (it's hard to tell rasp from leak under load, at least for me). I'm hoping I find a loose bolt or a failed gasket somewhere honestly, because the rasp is kinda intense. Regardless, I think a design with some kind of flex joints up in the Y-pipe section (like the stock ones had) would probably cut some of the rasp though.

Josh@STILLEN 04-10-2009 06:31 PM

I posted this in the other forum, but I'll repeat here.. with hopes this helps others find the right adjustments.

Quote:

Hey guys.. the exhaust can take some adjustment, as we have discussed. The best method (not saying anyone hasn't done this.. but I conferred with my service manager) is to loosen everything, and jacking at the y-pipe (hard!) get the clearance necessary to clear the crossmember.

This will take loosening the bolts at the catalytic converter brace which hooks to the transmission. This is a slotted brace, and can give you the 1/4" needed to clear everything.

You should not have to heat anything up to make clearance..

I have a 350Z on the rack, I shot a quick picture to show the location of the brace and the bolts I speak of:

http://www.stillen.com/misc/cat_brace_bolts.jpg

wstar 04-11-2009 02:59 PM

Well I think the raspiness I was worried about is mainly only audible from inside the car. I finally got to hear it from the outside when I got it Dyno'd today, and it sounds great from outside. The place I was planning to go (that had a Dyno Dynamics) had some scheduling issues, but I might go back there Monday. So for now, I went to Carboys here in Houston where they had a DynoJet available. They did 3 runs, they looked pretty consistent. Max HP was 305.3, Max Torque was 241.2. These numbers sound a little low to me for full intake/exhaust compared to what else we've been seeing (given that its a DynoJet), but on the other hand (a) This is a 7AT, the rest have all been 6MT so far, (b) It was extremely humid in Houston today, and (c) Every dyno and every car is different :)

Anyways, I realized after I got home that I've got no way to make the graphs. He gave me the raw DGP file for the runs that has all the data (including A:F ratio), and you're supposed to download some free software from DynoJet to view it and make your custom graphs. However, I'm all Mac here, and their software is Windows-only. Anyone else wanna take my file and make graphs for me? :) Video is uploading to youtube now too, I'll make a separate thread for the vid and the graphs (if someone can make them).

They also gave me a printout of the best run, I guess I could find somewhere to scan that in. The printout has lots of "gaps" in it, I'm not sure if it's just this run or if they're all like that. The tech said it was his sensors or whatever that were at fault for the gaps in the lines. Anyways, for a text analysis of what I can see on that, the torque curve is pretty broad and flat from about 4.5k to 6.5k, the horsepower is basically on a 45 degree slope that hits peak a little under 7k and stays there to where he cut off at (7.5k). Crossover point is about 6.6k.

Edit: bleh that DGP file he gave is like 95 bytes long, clearly I don't have the data, gonna go back by there later and get the real thing.

semtex 04-11-2009 06:15 PM

Thx for the update. I'm glad to hear that the torque curve remains flat! :tup: If you want me to try to generate a graph, PM me. But yeah, 95 bytes sounds suspect. Not sure why he did it this way tho. He could have saved the actual graph as a jpg file. I just bring a jump drive with me and tell them to make a copy to my jump drive.

wstar 04-11-2009 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by semtex (Post 55091)
Thx for the update. I'm glad to hear that the torque curve remains flat! :tup: If you want me to try to generate a graph, PM me. But yeah, 95 bytes sounds suspect. Not sure why he did it this way tho. He could have saved the actual graph as a jpg file. I just bring a jump drive with me and tell them to make a copy to my jump drive.

I did go back and get the correct files right after. There's a zipfile of the full raw data and a link to the dynojet software in the other thread: http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaus...c-e-dynod.html


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2