Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   300zx intake plenum (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/137191-300zx-intake-plenum.html)

spoolin03 01-05-2022 12:31 PM

300zx intake plenum
 
3 Attachment(s)
What do some of you think about putting the 300zx intake plenum onto the 370z VQ motor? It has bigger tanks to hold air and longer intake runners to each cylinder, meaning more air that is on standby for demand :D is that how it works?

Here are some pics next to a GTR manifold. Found these on twin turbo net

Spooler 01-05-2022 12:44 PM

That would be a no. Longer intake runners will reduce midrange TQ. Same thing happens if you use the GTR intake manifold.

spoolin03 01-06-2022 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spooler (Post 4017285)
That would be a no. Longer intake runners will reduce midrange TQ. Same thing happens if you use the GTR intake manifold.

I request citations from your lead engineer

Rusty 01-06-2022 02:33 PM

On a N/A motor. Long runners for low end. Short runners for top end. It has to do with the velocity and momentum of the air moving through.

JARblue 01-07-2022 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spoolin03 (Post 4017403)
I request citations from your lead engineer

:rolleyes: Guess you'll just have to take the lead yourself cause that's not gonna happen lol

The stock plastic manifold is pretty damn efficient. It's very difficult to justify any other available option on a stock VQ motor. Many have tried. Unless it's for aesthetics only, in which case, you just get the CJM intake manifold :drool: :tup:

Spooler 01-07-2022 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spoolin03 (Post 4017403)
I request citations from your lead engineer

Talk with other folks who have installed the GTR manifold and lost hp/TQ. They go back to the stock intake or the SOHO intake. You don't have to take my word for it.

spoolin03 01-08-2022 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 4017444)
:rolleyes: Guess you'll just have to take the lead yourself cause that's not gonna happen lol

The stock plastic manifold is pretty damn efficient. It's very difficult to justify any other available option on a stock VQ motor. Many have tried. Unless it's for aesthetics only, in which case, you just get the CJM intake manifold :drool: :tup:


Anything can be improved is my theory

spoolin03 01-08-2022 02:25 PM

Guys relax, it's just discussion :D

Rusty 01-08-2022 03:10 PM

There is nothing out there to improve over the stock manifold for N/A. Unless you go ITB. And that starts about 10K.

JARblue 01-08-2022 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spoolin03 (Post 4017546)
Anything can be improved is my theory

That's a good theory. The problem is reality.

Every time someone comes up with a new intake manifold design, it's a big hype fest until the production and then suddenly silence. Because they dyno it with zero gains or more often a loss in power. $1000-2000 for that is a tough swallow compared to the inexpensive plastic stock manifold.

Check out the AAM intake manifold trainwreck of a thread :bowrofl:

spoolin03 01-08-2022 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 4017567)
That's a good theory. The problem is reality.

Every time someone comes up with a new intake manifold design, it's a big hype fest until the production and then suddenly silence. Because they dyno it with zero gains or more often a loss in power. $1000-2000 for that is a tough swallow compared to the inexpensive plastic stock manifold.

Check out the AAM intake manifold trainwreck of a thread :bowrofl:

:rofl2:

I'm sure they got good results when they first designed it. But everything else that followed was rough for them it seems. It looks like people are using them for turbo applications.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2