![]() |
Forced Induction gains and 7AT
I've posted this in the "development" threads, and it doesn't get answered, so, here it is.
I and a few others on here have the 7AT...how much power can those handle before they pop? I'm thinking of going with the GTM Twin Turbo setup, or, potentially a supercharger when one comes out. But, if the tranny can't hang, then it'll be headers/HFC's/catback and call it a day (or maybe trade it in for a 6MT and lose my ***...) |
Good question! I wonder, too. I'm at that point now.....bolted myself to the max on my Z.....only FI left...if I decide to go there. I will consider the Cobb AccessPORT when they finally have it available and an ECU flash.
According to my last DynoDynamics numbers I was sitting at 307 whp....not bad....but I'd like to squeeze a lil more out, if possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wouldn't the extra gear also be a factor to the amount of power the tranny can handle from a turbo?? |
Quote:
|
Look on myg37.com you will find a pretty good answer there. But you can expect slightly more gains due to less power throuhg the drive train on the Z compared to the G.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:roflpuke2: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:tiphat: |
I know this is an old thread and I dont even own a 370z but this info may be relevant: Stock 2009 Infiniti FX50 S AWD Dyno Sheet Details - DragTimes.com
I believe your 7at is the same as in the fx 50 which appears to dyno at 329hp and 299lb-ft on a dynojet according to the above dyno chart. Torque tends to be more important then HP in transmission longevity so it stands to reason that if it can handle a stock 5.0l fx50 with 299lb-ft it probably has some engineered in cushion for more torque. Granted that was a dyno jet and not a mustang dyno..... hope this helps EDIT: off to my regularly scheduled lurking... see you all in 6 months. |
Well, given the torque of a stock Z is 269ft-lb, that leaves only about 10% gain before hitting that 299ft-lb transmission spec.
I assume there is some margin of "over-engineering" built in, but, how much? I mean, we're only talking a fwe percentage points of increase before something could go pop. 10% seems "safe" in terms of torque gain. Will a supercharger do more than that - probably...it's only a gain of about 30ft-lbs. I'm sure with bolt-ons people are seeing that much. |
I posted that same question and never got a clear answer. I suspect that someone will offer a package to build the tranny to sustain higher HP numbers.
|
I would think the 7AT could handle 450whp easily, But thats just me
DAN |
Quote:
|
Im going based off of the old tranny and its power handling capabilities, also this is the trans out of the FX50 is it not?
DAN |
Quote:
Quote:
We can speculate all we want but until we start seeing high hp/tq or F.I. cars dropping trans and looking at what numbers they are killing them will we truly know the answer. Add to that driving style will have a lot to do with how well the drive train handles the power as well. if you are a street light racer every light and push your car regularly you may see a failure at a lower hp/tq level than someone who is a less aggressive driver. So really who knows do some research as Lug has and we can add lets say 20-30% over engineering to what they are handling stock and that is probably a safe number to stay around for starters at least. |
the factory engine torque is 270lbft but the rear wheel torque (as was measured by the fx50 dyno or a 370z dyno) would be less in a Z ~230 ish.... remember a stock engine torque rating for the fx50 is 369lbft.... or about 100lbft more at the engine then a Z.... Even if this translates to only 70lbft at rear wheels (as evident by the dyno) that is a substantial built in margin. Thats why I posted an actual dyno sheet of the rw torque rather then the official values, but even so the engineerd cussion would be above the fx50's value...380-390lbft at the engine would be a very conservative guess ie about 320rwtq... ok last post for a very long time.
EDIT: Interestingly that Greddy turbo kit looked to be about 330-340rwtq at about 450rwhp and 6.4psi.... so just dial back to 4.5 to 5 psi and you theoreticly should have a 400rwhp/310rwtq car. Still would be very very quick at 3200-3300lbs. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2