It's also with their high compression pistons and upgraded rods . I asked jun about these gains.

So some really funny things to point out.
As I'm reading the numbers up top it looks like there stock factory car was putting down numbers our full bolton cars do 312 I don't think is right and it looked like the TQ was 229 damn that's low. And then the new numbers holly ****. 373hp and 272 TQ huge gains for just cams. Look at there air fuel% aka stock it was 14.9 then after it was -9.1 something is off. I duno I don't read Japanese but my friend does and I'm gonna get to the bottom of this. Lol.

http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1350576245
http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1350576415


no i'm not splicing together the original image. deal with it :p

Bear in mind that chart is in metric hp (.986 hp per ps), and also looks to read high.


Gains in percentages are far more telling than raw gain numbers.


I would also generally discredit any comparison that looks at runs that far apart.

Also, trollolololololol at vastly different air pressures.

the % error column still makes no sense to me, but that's the literal translation of it. i dunno.

also funny: the "rated" on the 2012 run is up to 300? wtf :p somebody has a typo!

Torque is in Nm not lbft in that chart -- also thats some sort of error margin not AFR.