Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Engine & Drivetrain (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/)
-   -   NISMO 370z DYNO SPECS (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/10007-nismo-370z-dyno-specs.html)

Endgame 10-11-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 370Zsteve (Post 231938)
Go to 7:45 of this video, watch it, and then repost your thoughts as to MT's impression of this vehicle. Something ain't right. :tiphat:

TechEBlog Motor Trend: Best Driver's Car Competition

My thoughts do not change; I heard those comments before. I am talking sheer lap times..... Nismo was not there lap time wise when compared to the others (not including the MX5)....

Nismo_370 10-11-2009 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeD (Post 232832)
Thanks for the info. :tup:

Your 102 MPH speaks volumes. Unfortunately, you can't excuse poor driving or track-prep for an unsatisfactory trap-speed, as it is a parameter not significantly effected. To delve a little deeper, your 23.3 MPH delta between the 660' and 1320' solidifies you car as being slower-than-average.

Look like your 330 horses making it to the wheels aren't working as hard as the 275 or so in a stock Base-model.

We've seen bone stock 7ATs go 13.2 @ 108 MPH. Damn...they must make upwards of 375 RWHP. :roflpuke2:

I never claimed i was faster, nor claimed 330 hp was accurate... you definitely missing a point!
I exposed the numbers i was shown by professionals.

I will get back to you personally, when I do DYNO elsewhere.

RCZ 10-11-2009 11:38 PM

Sorry I hurt your e-feelings with my first comment...

The point is that you arent making 330whp. We aren't hating, but your are now giving us a reason to. Please just answer one question and we will leave you alone.

Do you really think you have 330whp? Regardless of what your dyno run says, just tell us if you think you have 330whp.

Now if your answer is "no" then WHY the heck (I said heck not hell I'm being polite) did you post it on your sig as if you did?

Don't be fooled by these numbers man, they are way too high...I'm not a hater (by the way what where you thinking with the whole definition of hater thing in your sig, are you serious?) but I tell it like I see it. There are a lot of folks in here who have more experience with this car than you do and it would be smart to listen to them.

Whats with people calling people haters, its getting so effin annoying. Just stop..

JoeD 10-11-2009 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 232927)
Whats with people calling people haters, its getting so effin annoying. Just stop..

Wow...truer words have not been spoken.

He's not the only one by any means. Many here are quick to label someone as a "hater" if they say anything negative, so much so that it sticks out more than any other forum I'm a part of. Is it demographical? I can't remember the last time I've heard that word used in the same context in real-world communication, but perhaps it's because I don't associate with ghetto teenagers.

tru_Asiatik 10-12-2009 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 232927)
Sorry I hurt your e-feelings with my first comment...

The point is that you arent making 330whp. We aren't hating, but your are now giving us a reason to. Please just answer one question and we will leave you alone.

Do you really think you have 330whp? Regardless of what your dyno run says, just tell us if you think you have 330whp.

Now if your answer is "no" then WHY the heck (I said heck not hell I'm being polite) did you post it on your sig as if you did?

Don't be fooled by these numbers man, they are way too high...I'm not a hater (by the way what where you thinking with the whole definition of hater thing in your sig, are you serious?) but I tell it like I see it. There are a lot of folks in here who have more experience with this car than you do and it would be smart to listen to them.

Whats with people calling people haters, its getting so effin annoying. Just stop..

+1 agreed

Knives 10-12-2009 12:19 AM

I think maybe everyone has gotten off on the wrong foot here because all that's happened is this kid has gotten defensive and I foresee this thread going on and on, when it should have ended 3 pages ago.

I think what most people on here are trying to say is, we believe it's a good idea for you to double check your numbers. You don't have to listen to people on this board (though I'd advise it), but do your own research. Maybe have another go around with a different dyno. You could just go around and state your initial readings as fact, but you will keep getting the same reactions, I guarantee it.

Nismo_370 10-12-2009 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 232927)
Sorry I hurt your e-feelings with my first comment...

The point is that you arent making 330whp. We aren't hating, but your are now giving us a reason to. Please just answer one question and we will leave you alone.

Do you really think you have 330whp? Regardless of what your dyno run says, just tell us if you think you have 330whp.

Now if your answer is "no" then WHY the heck (I said heck not hell I'm being polite) did you post it on your sig as if you did?

Don't be fooled by these numbers man, they are way too high...I'm not a hater (by the way what where you thinking with the whole definition of hater thing in your sig, are you serious?) but I tell it like I see it. There are a lot of folks in here who have more experience with this car than you do and it would be smart to listen to them.

Whats with people calling people haters, its getting so effin annoying. Just stop..

First off... I didn't call you a hater. But I find your words "We aren't hating, but your are now giving us a reason to."ironic, as they seem to underline the definition in my signature.

Second, "Do i think i have 330 WHP?" well obviously after todays discussion i do not think so. Did i think so before? Yes, as I trusted the opinion and technology of professional shop.

Third, "Why did i post the numbers in my signature?". Simply for the same reason you posted your Numbers "RCZ", in your signature. I think you should take your numbers of your signature as well, cause i bet you their are wrong. Cause if you think you are making those numbers with your mods, my point was, my stock car wasn't that far off it. Which seems to be the point that you are still neglecting.

Besides, its my signature, not yours.

Again, not saying you are hater nor i did so before. As i have already mentioned in my previous posts, which you seemed to ignore. I now realize that number is overrated.

Oh and sorry I hurt your e-feelings with the word "hater"

Nismo_370 10-12-2009 12:59 AM

BTW, here is the DYNO Results from the BASE 370Z that ran the same day, on the same DYNO. If the owner wants to share his mods, he can. I can't say what he had, as i don't know.

http://www.the370z.com/members/diabl...7-scan0001.jpg

=================
Here is mine again (again i will upload clear picture tomorrow):
http://www.the370z.com/members/nismo...2-nismo370.jpg

SIDE BY SIDE:
http://www.the370z.com/members/diabl...7-scan0001.jpghttp://www.the370z.com/members/nismo...2-nismo370.jpg

diablokev87 10-12-2009 05:28 AM

Hey thats my Dyno sheet. :-). Rob, gots to tell me what Performance Motors say when you tell them about this thread.

One_Quick_Z 10-12-2009 06:17 AM

Like I said earlier dont worry about how bad people slam you its just an internet forum.



DAN

370Zsteve 10-12-2009 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Endgame (Post 232835)
My thoughts do not change; I heard those comments before. I am talking sheer lap times..... Nismo was not there lap time wise when compared to the others (not including the MX5)....

Not there? You mean it didn't beat the Audi supercar that cost three times as much $$$$? Shocking.

MT loved the car, in fact the pro drive said it was the best car on the track out of the entire field.

370Zsteve 10-12-2009 06:42 AM

I'm curious...why is your dyno sheet a crappy scan while someone else's is a digital file? Where did you get the digital file for the other guy's car? And why don't you have one of your own? Not "hating", just asking. Seems weird?..................:ugh2:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo_370 (Post 232986)
BTW, here is the DYNO Results from the BASE 370Z that ran the same day, on the same DYNO. If the owner wants to share his mods, he can. I can't say what he had, as i don't know.

http://www.the370z.com/members/diabl...7-scan0001.jpg

=================
Here is mine again (again i will upload clear picture tomorrow):
http://www.the370z.com/members/nismo...2-nismo370.jpg

SIDE BY SIDE:
http://www.the370z.com/members/diabl...7-scan0001.jpghttp://www.the370z.com/members/nismo...2-nismo370.jpg


diablokev87 10-12-2009 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 370Zsteve (Post 233053)
I'm curious...why is your dyno sheet a crappy scan while someone else's is a digital file? Where did you get the digital file for the other guy's car? And why don't you have one of your own? Not "hating", just asking. Seems weird?..................:ugh2:

I can answer that question. I scanned my sheet when i got home. I have a scanner at home and wanted to post the pic to the thread that had all the other dudes that went to the dyno day. With all of the pretty harsh comments about his IPhone picture, i guess it just made sense to put this pic in this thread.

Nismo370 10-12-2009 08:26 AM

Hey Rob watsup, sorry i took so long to come defend you...But I had the other nismo that was there...My first run stock i made 310whp and 238 trq...My second run with berk tech. test pipes i made 332whp and 252trq. Regards if its accurate or not i got a huge gain with just the test pipes, so im happy with it. What Rob put down is wat he put down...Maybe it reads high or maybe it doesnt, who cares, stop flaming the guy. Go flame performance motorsports if you gotta problem with the #'s....

theDreamer 10-12-2009 09:02 AM

:drama:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2